Skip to main content
Skip to main content

SentinelOne Vendor Risk Assessment — Full Report

Before you share customer data with SentinelOne, your compliance team needs documented proof they can be trusted. ThirdProof investigated SentinelOne across 27 intelligence sources — here's what we found.

⚠ FedRAMP Status: Not found in the FedRAMP Marketplace. Vendors handling government data or CUI must be FedRAMP authorized.

Risk Tier
Tier 3Moderate Risk
SOC 2
⚠ Vendor Attested
FedRAMP
— Not Authorized
Last Assessed
Mar 25, 2026
🟢IP Reputation: Abuse score: 0%, 0 reports🟡SSL/TLS: TLSv1.3🟢Domain Age: 18.7 years🟢Infrastructure: 13 open ports, 0 CVEs
FedRAMP Status
SentinelOne is not listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace as of March 2026.
SOC 2 Status
SentinelOne has a SOC 2 claim detected on their trust page. Claim is vendor-attested — no public registry exists for independent verification.
Sanctions Screening
SentinelOne returned no matches in OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening.
Risk Tier
ThirdProof assigned SentinelOne a Moderate Risk tier with 96% confidence across 27 intelligence sources.

24 sources queried. 96% confidence. Every SentinelOne investigation produces both a risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire — no vendor follow-up required.

Get SentinelOne's Full Report Free →
5 free investigations|Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire|Avg. 7 minutes

Certification & Compliance Status

Need a complete vendor security questionnaire?

Run a full ThirdProof investigation to get 133 security questions auto-filled with source evidence — ready for your next audit or vendor onboarding review.

Get SentinelOne's Full Report Free →
Not Listed on FedRAMP Marketplace

Verified against FedRAMP Marketplace API as of March 2026

Organizations with federal compliance requirements should verify this directly at marketplace.fedramp.gov.

SentinelOne is not listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace.

27 data sources queried per assessment
Reports generated in an average of 7 minutes
SHA-256 verified for audit integrity
Deterministic risk scoring — no AI guesswork
3Tier

Moderate Risk

Sentinelone

Vendor Risk Assessment

Confidence Score96%

Based on data availability and source coverage

24

Sources Queried

22

Sources With Data

March 25, 2026

Last Assessed

Executive Summary

AI-generated analysis for Sentinelone

SentinelOne (sentinelone.com) is a publicly active cybersecurity vendor incorporated in Delaware, assessed at Tier 3 (Moderate Risk) with a 96% confidence score. This rating reflects a strong overall security and compliance posture tempered by a notable HTTP security header gap on the marketing website and an unresolved governance event involving executive leadership and federal clearances. SentinelOne presents several meaningful positive signals that distinguish it from typical vendors at this tier:

Key Findings

  • FedRAMP Authorization (Moderate Impact Level) has been independently verified via the FedRAMP Marketplace registry for its Singularity Platform, authorized since July 2020 — a high bar for government and enterprise buyers.
  • The domain carries a clean reputation across all malware and phishing blacklists, with zero threat intelligence pulses, zero abuse reports, and a clean Malware detection service status.
  • The vendor publishes a dedicated trust page (trust.sentinelone.com) powered by Drata, with SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS, ISO/IEC 27001 (2022), ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, CSA STAR Level 1, GDPR, CCPA, and Cyber Essentials all claimed as compliance postures.
  • Infrastructure is protected by Cloudflare CDN, with zero known CVEs detected on exposed infrastructure.
  • No sanctions matches, no adverse media, no SEC enforcement filings, and no FDIC concerns were identified. The primary concerns requiring attention are:
  • The marketing website (sentinelone.com) scored a D (30/100) on Mozilla HTTP Observatory, with missing Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options headers. While this does not affect the security product itself, it is inconsistent with the vendor's security-first positioning.
  • A 2025 executive order revoked security clearances associated with former CISA Director Chris Krebs, then a SentinelOne executive, leading to his departure. This event generated measurable discussion in the security community and carries residual implications for the vendor's federal contracting posture and enterprise credibility, though no regulatory sanctions against the company itself were identified.
  • Several claimed certifications (ISO 27001, PCI DSS, SOC 2) could not be independently verified via public registries and remain vendor-attested. Buyers should request the underlying audit reports directly.
  • AI data usage policies were located but do not explicitly state whether customer data is used for model training, and no third-party AI providers are disclosed. Overall, SentinelOne is a well-established, heavily credentialed security vendor with independently verified federal authorization and a clean threat posture. The Tier 3 rating is driven by the combination of the unresolved HTTP security gap and the governance-level event that, while not resulting in regulatory action, warrants documentation in enterprise vendor risk programs.

Independence Statement

All evidence supporting this assessment was independently sourced from external public registries, threat intelligence feeds, DNS infrastructure analysis, and open-source media — without any participation, submission, or review by SentinelOne.

Investigation Findings

3 findings identified for Sentinelone

1 high2 medium
high

HTTP Security Grade: D

sentinelone.com received a poor grade (D) from Mozilla HTTP Observatory. Multiple security headers or configurations are missing.

medium

Missing Security Headers

sentinelone.com is missing 2 recommended security headers: Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options.

medium

Tech Community Discussion: trust

2 Hacker News stories about "SentinelOne" related to trust. Top story: "Former cybersecurity chief Chris Krebs leaves SentinelOne after executive order" (88 points).

Security Strengths

27 positive signals verified

FedRAMP Authorization Independently Verified

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Clean IP Reputation

IP Reputation

Clean Safe Browsing Status

Malware & Phishing Check

Clean Website Security Scan

Website Security Scan

Legal Entity Actively Registered

Business Registration

No Sanctions Matches Found

Sanctions & Watchlist Screening

No Adverse Media Signals

Adverse Media Scan (Fallback)

Firmographic Data Available

Company Intelligence

Valid SSL Certificate

Domain Analysis

13 Open Ports Detected

Infrastructure Exposure

Established Domain (18+ years)

Domain Registration

Clean domain reputation

Threat Intelligence

Certificate Data from TLS Handshake

Certificate Transparency

Web Archive History Unavailable

Web Archive History

No Threat Intelligence Pulses

Threat Intelligence (OTX)

Certification Claimed: SOC 2

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Certification Claimed: PCI DSS

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Certification Claimed: GDPR

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Certification Claimed: CCPA

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Certification Claimed: CSA STAR

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Certification Claimed: Cyber Essentials

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Not Found as FDIC-Insured Institution

FDIC Institution Check

No SEC Enforcement Filings Found

SEC Filing Search

No Relevant Historical Media Coverage

Historical Media Search

FedRAMP Authorization Confirmed via Registry

Certification Registry Verification

SOC 2 Compliance Claimed on Trust Page

Certification Registry Verification

Recommended Actions

Steps to address findings for Sentinelone

  1. 1

    Request SentinelOne's current SOC 2 Type II report and bridge letter — check their trust page at trust.sentinelone.com (many reports are available there with a vendor NDA) or contact their security team directly at security@sentinelone.com. Confirm the audit period covers the last 12 months and that the bridge letter is dated within 6 months.

  2. 2

    Request ISO 27001 certificate documentation directly from SentinelOne's compliance team — ask for the certificate number, issuing body, and expiry date so you can independently verify via the IAF CertSearch registry at iafcertsearch.org.

  3. 3

    Document the Chris Krebs executive order event in your vendor risk register with a note on its status: this was a U.S. government security clearance action affecting an individual employee, not a regulatory enforcement action against the company. Assess whether your organization has federal contracting dependencies on SentinelOne that could be affected by any ongoing federal relationship constraints.

  4. 4

    Raise the HTTP security header gap (missing CSP and X-Frame-Options on sentinelone.com) in your next vendor security review. Ask SentinelOne to confirm whether a remediation plan is in place and request their internal application security scanning results for the Singularity Platform console.

  5. 5

    Request clarification on AI data usage: ask SentinelOne's legal or security team to confirm in writing whether customer data is used to train AI/ML models (including Purple AI or similar features), what third-party AI providers are used in the platform, and whether enterprise customers can opt out. Reference their privacy notice at https://www.sentinelone.com/legal/privacy-notice/ as the starting point.

  6. 6

    Verify TLS certificate renewal automation is active for sentinelone.com before May 1, 2026 — ask your SentinelOne account team to confirm the automated renewal mechanism and that it was tested within the last 90 days.

  7. 7

    For the FedRAMP-authorized Singularity Platform, confirm your specific deployment is covered under the authorized boundary by reviewing the authorization package at https://marketplace.fedramp.gov/products/FR1919071020 and requesting the System Security Plan (SSP) or a customer responsibility matrix from your SentinelOne federal account team.

Intelligence Sources Queried

24 sources in this assessment

22of 24 sources returned data
IP Reputation
AI Data Usage Policy
Threat Intelligence (OTX)
Certification Registry Verification
Domain Analysis
FDIC Institution Check
Business Registration
Historical Media Search
Tech Community Sentiment
Company Intelligence
Adverse Media Scan (Fallback)
HTTP Security Scan
Sanctions & Watchlist Screening
Malware & Phishing Check
SEC Filing Search
Infrastructure Exposure
SSL/TLS Analysis
Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery
Trust & Compliance Page Scan
Website Security Scan
Threat Intelligence
Domain Registration
Certificate Transparency
Web Archive History

Data Coverage Notes

Some data sources may have had limited availability during this assessment. This does not reflect negatively on the vendor.

  • Web archive history was unavailable during this assessment, limiting the ability to establish a full longitudinal view of the domain's online presence prior to current data sources.
  • Certificate Transparency log data (Certificate Transparency service) was partially unavailable; subdomain enumeration via CT logs could not be completed, and certificate data was derived from a direct TLS handshake only.
  • ISO 27001 certification could not be independently verified through the IAF CertSearch public registry during this assessment period — the claim appears on the vendor's trust page but should be treated as vendor-attested pending manual verification.
  • PCI DSS listing status could not be confirmed via the public Visa/Mastercard service provider registries — the PCI DSS claim is vendor-attested via trust.sentinelone.com.
  • HITRUST certification status could not be confirmed; the HITRUST certified entity directory was not renderable during this assessment and no independent evidence of HITRUST certification was found.
  • AI data usage policy was located but contains no explicit statements regarding customer data training practices or third-party AI provider usage, limiting the ability to fully assess AI-related data handling risk.
  • The subprocessor list retrieved (Qualys, SSL/TLS analysis service) represents only the vendor's published page at the time of assessment and may not reflect the full scope of subprocessors used in the Singularity Platform environment.
183+
Vendors assessed
98%
Average confidence
<2 min
Time to report
What a ThirdProof assessment covers

Sanctions Screening

Is SentinelOne on any OFAC, EU, or UN sanctions list? Are any officers or affiliates flagged?

Cyber Risk Assessment

What is SentinelOne's security posture? Threat intelligence scanning, known vulnerabilities, and security header analysis.

Business Registration

Is SentinelOne a legitimately registered business entity? Corporate status, jurisdiction, and officer verification.

Adverse Media Analysis

Has SentinelOne appeared in negative news coverage? Data breaches, lawsuits, regulatory actions, and complaints.

Domain & Infrastructure

Is SentinelOne's website secure? TLS configuration, DNS hygiene, security headers, and domain age analysis.

Company Intelligence

What are SentinelOne's firmographics? Employee count, industry classification, technology stack, and corporate structure.

Trust & Compliance Verification

Does SentinelOne claim SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST, or FedRAMP? ThirdProof scans trust pages for certification claims and cross-references the FedRAMP public registry for independent verification.

Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery

Who does SentinelOne depend on? ThirdProof discovers subprocessors from vendor-published pages and runs sanctions screening and safe browsing checks against each one.

Regulatory & Financial Filings

Has SentinelOne appeared in SEC enforcement filings? Is it associated with any FDIC bank failures? ThirdProof searches regulatory databases with entity verification to confirm attribution.

Full methodology, rule engine, and AI disclosure: /methodology

Seeing this in an audit? ThirdProof lets you investigate SentinelOne and every other vendor in your stack — average report time: 7 minutes. Get SentinelOne's Full Report Free →

Frequently asked about SentinelOne

Is SentinelOne FedRAMP authorized?+
SentinelOne is not currently listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace as of March 2026.
Does SentinelOne have SOC 2 Type II?+
Yes — SentinelOne holds SOC 2 (Type II not confirmed). Rated Moderate Risk — security header gaps found. See all 3 findings →
Is SentinelOne on the OFAC sanctions list?+
SentinelOne returned no matches in ThirdProof's OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening as of March 2026.
What is SentinelOne's vendor risk tier?+
ThirdProof assigned SentinelOne a risk tier of Moderate Risk with 96% confidence based on assessment across 27 intelligence sources as of March 2026.
Can I get an auto-filled security questionnaire for SentinelOne?+
Yes. Every ThirdProof investigation of SentinelOne produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and a 133-question security questionnaire pre-filled with evidence from 27 independent sources. The questionnaire is mapped to SIG, SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS and 9 other frameworks — answered without sending SentinelOne a single email or waiting for a vendor response.
Is SentinelOne safe to use as a vendor?+
SentinelOne is a endpoint security vendor that handles organizational data. Safety depends on their current security posture, certification status, and how they handle your specific data. ThirdProof automates this evaluation across 27 intelligence sources — sanctions databases (OFAC, EU, UN), business registration verification, adverse media scanning, and cyber risk assessment — producing a deterministic risk tier with confidence score plus an auto-filled security questionnaire. Run a free investigation to see SentinelOne's full risk profile.
Does SentinelOne have SOC 2 certification?+
Yes — SentinelOne holds SOC 2 + 6 other certs. Rated Moderate Risk — security header gaps found. See all 3 findings →
Has SentinelOne had any data breaches?+
Data breach history is an important signal for any vendor, particularly endpoint security platforms like SentinelOne that handle organizational data. ThirdProof's adverse media analysis searches multiple news APIs and public records for data breaches, security incidents, lawsuits, regulatory enforcement actions, and financial distress signals. Each finding is linked to its original source with severity classification.
Is SentinelOne on any sanctions lists?+
Sanctions screening is standard due diligence for endpoint security vendors. ThirdProof screens SentinelOne against OFAC SDN, consolidated international sanctions lists, and PEP databases. The screening uses entity name verification to reduce false positives. If SentinelOne or any associated officers appear on a sanctions list, this triggers automatic escalation to the highest risk tier.
How do I assess SentinelOne for vendor risk?+
Assessing SentinelOne as a endpoint security vendor involves verifying SOC 2 Type II and applicable industry standards compliance, reviewing their subprocessor chain, and checking sanctions exposure. ThirdProof automates this across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — no questionnaires or vendor participation required. Your first 5 investigations are free.
How long does a ThirdProof assessment take?+
A ThirdProof assessment completes in an average of 7 minutes. 27 intelligence sources are queried in parallel — sanctions databases, business registries, threat intelligence feeds, certificate transparency logs, and more. The result is a deterministic risk tier with confidence score and audit-ready PDF report.
Is ThirdProof free?+
ThirdProof offers 5 free vendor assessments with no credit card required. Each assessment includes the full report — risk tier, confidence score, individual findings, executive summary, and PDF export. Paid plans start at $399/month for teams that need ongoing vendor monitoring.
Can I use a ThirdProof report as SOC 2 audit evidence?+
Yes. ThirdProof reports are designed to satisfy SOC 2 CC9.2 (vendor risk management) requirements. Each report includes SHA-256 integrity verification, methodology disclosure, source attribution for every finding, and AI content labeling. Auditors can independently verify the report's authenticity and trace each finding to its original source.
How is ThirdProof different from a security questionnaire?+
Security questionnaires require vendor participation, take weeks, and produce self-reported answers. ThirdProof queries 27 independent intelligence sources — no vendor involvement needed. Risk tiers are assigned by a deterministic rules engine (not AI opinion), and every finding links to its original source. You get an audit-ready report in an average of 7 minutes instead of waiting weeks for a questionnaire response.

SentinelOne is in your vendor stack. Can you prove you assessed them?

SOC 2 CC9.2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and CMMC all require documented vendor due diligence — not just knowing the answer, but having audit-ready evidence you verified it. Most compliance teams can't produce that documentation on demand.

ThirdProof investigates SentinelOne across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — sanctions screening, cyber posture, SOC 2 verification, FedRAMP status, and more. Every investigation produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire your prospects and auditors expect to see.

✓ 5 free investigations✓ Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire✓ No credit card required✓ Average report time: 7 minutes

Replaces $600–$900 in manual compliance consulting time per vendor assessed.