Skip to main content
Skip to main content

SAP Vendor Risk Assessment — Full Report

Germany-headquartered · EU regulated

Before you share customer data with SAP, your compliance team needs documented proof they can be trusted. ThirdProof investigated SAP across 27 intelligence sources — here's what we found.

⚠ FedRAMP Status: Not found in the FedRAMP Marketplace. Vendors handling government data or CUI must be FedRAMP authorized.

Risk Tier
Tier 3Moderate Risk
SOC 2
— Not Found
FedRAMP
— Not Authorized
Last Assessed
Apr 17, 2026
🟢IP Reputation: Abuse score: 0%, 0 reports🟡SSL/TLS: TLSv1.3🟢Domain Age: 31.2 years🟢Infrastructure: 2 open ports, 0 CVEs
FedRAMP Status
SAP is not listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace as of March 2026.
SOC 2 Status
SAP has not had a SOC 2 claim detected on their trust page.
Sanctions Screening
SAP returned no matches in OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening.
Risk Tier
ThirdProof assigned SAP a Moderate Risk tier with 100% confidence across 27 intelligence sources.

27 sources queried. 100% confidence. Every SAP investigation produces both a risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire — no vendor follow-up required.

Get SAP's Full Report Free →
5 free investigations|Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire|Avg. 7 minutes

Certification & Compliance Status

Need a complete vendor security questionnaire?

Run a full ThirdProof investigation to get 133 security questions auto-filled with source evidence — ready for your next audit or vendor onboarding review.

Get SAP's Full Report Free →
Not Listed on FedRAMP Marketplace

Verified against FedRAMP Marketplace API as of March 2026

Organizations with federal compliance requirements should verify this directly at marketplace.fedramp.gov.

SAP is not listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace.

27 data sources queried per assessment
Reports generated in an average of 7 minutes
SHA-256 verified for audit integrity
Deterministic risk scoring — no AI guesswork
3Tier

Moderate Risk

SAP

Vendor Risk Assessment

Confidence Score100%

Based on data availability and source coverage

27

Sources Queried

27

Sources With Data

April 17, 2026

Last Assessed

Executive Summary

AI-generated analysis for SAP

SAP (sap.com) is a globally recognized enterprise software vendor assessed at Tier 3 (Moderate Risk), reflecting a strong underlying security posture tempered by several findings that warrant attention before broader deployment. SAP demonstrates several meaningful positive signals. The domain carries a clean reputation with no blacklist entries, no malware indicators, and a zero IP abuse score. Infrastructure exposure is minimal, with only standard web ports (80, 443) exposed and no known CVEs detected. SAP's trust page at https://sap.com/trust references ISO 27001 and SOC 2, and the vendor independently claims PCI DSS 4.0.1 compliance for its Enterprise Cloud Services, SOC 1 Type II reporting, NIST CSF v1.1 Tier 3 alignment, and HIPAA compliance with BAA availability. Named security leadership is established, with a CSO heading a global security unit. SAP also offers meaningful data residency and sovereignty options, tenant isolation via separate cloud accounts, AES-256 encryption at rest, and TLS 1.3 in transit. Several concerns temper the overall assessment:

Key Findings

  • **Adverse and historical media**: A trade secret lawsuit filed by o9 Solutions was reported in November 2025. Separately, historical media identified a significant cyberattack in 2025 drawing comparisons to nation-state threat actors, and SAP resolved U.S. bribery allegations for over $220M in January 2024 — both warranting awareness.
  • **Certification verification gap**: ISO 27001 is claimed on the trust page but could not be confirmed through the IAF CertSearch public registry, creating a contradiction that compliance teams should resolve by requesting the current certificate directly.
  • **AI data training opt-out**: SAP's AI ethics policy indicates customer data may be used for AI model training unless customers actively opt out via the SAP for Me interface — a process that requires deliberate action by the customer organization.
  • **HTTP security headers**: Despite valid TLS and HSTS, the marketing site (sap.com) scored D- (25/100) on the HTTP Observatory scan, indicating missing headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  • **Subprocessor list**: A subprocessor page exists at https://sap.com/privacy/subprocessors but could not be parsed by automated means, leaving third-party supply chain exposure unconfirmed. Overall, SAP is a mature, well-resourced enterprise vendor with a credible security program, but the combination of unverified certification claims, an opt-out AI training default, active litigation, and historical enforcement actions places this assessment at a conditional approval posture pending specific verification steps.

Independence Statement

All evidence in this assessment was independently sourced from external data feeds, public registries, domain analysis tools, and open-source intelligence without any participation, disclosure, or review by SAP.

Investigation Findings

7 findings identified for SAP

1 high6 medium
high

Adverse Media: SAP cyberattack currently underway with wide impact

1 article(s) reference significant concerns for "SAP": "SAP cyberattack widens, drawing Salt Typhoon and Volt Typhoon comparisons" (CyberScoop) https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMinAFBVV95cUxNVTZTSTVFUWFPNW1CUDlBLWtwUW43cWhGYkNRZExKRmpZQXlWNFVrQ29PcjhlY3BrSS00aENIbVJVQTZncmsza3NOT3FKcl8zUWR2SGZKVFRRalJEYWhsZFhUc1ZibWNKeU8tbFpQQ0k1Rk9mYWNScVY2U0x6MWRsUTI0cDhEekUtQW5qM05sa1c4cnREbW51REllYkk?oc=5

medium

Adverse Media: legal

Article from www.reuters.com: "SAP sued by US software company over trade secrets | Reuters"

medium

Missing Security Headers

sap.com is missing 2 recommended security headers: Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options.

medium

HTTP Security Grade: D- (Marketing Site)

sap.com received a poor grade (D-) from Mozilla HTTP Observatory. Multiple security headers or configurations are missing. Note: This scan was performed on the marketing site (sap.com). The application endpoint (accounts.sap.com) may have different security headers. Verify the application domain separately.

medium

Multiple Certificate Issuers (54)

sap.com has certificates from 54 different Certificate Authorities. This may indicate inconsistent certificate management practices.

medium

New Web Presence (< 1 year)

sap.com first appeared very recently. This indicates a relatively new web presence.

medium

AI Model Training Requires Opt-Out

sap.com may use customer data for AI training unless customers opt out. Review the opt-out process.

Security Strengths

23 positive signals verified

Legal Entity Actively Registered

Business Registration

Sanctions Data Incomplete

Sanctions & Watchlist Screening

Low-Confidence Sanctions Matches Only

Sanctions & Watchlist Screening

No Adverse Media Signals

Adverse Media Scan (Fallback)

Firmographic Data Available

Company Intelligence

Valid SSL Certificate

Domain Analysis

2 Open Ports Detected

Infrastructure Exposure

Established Domain (31+ years)

Domain Registration

Clean domain reputation

Threat Intelligence

Tech Community Discussion: security incident

Tech Community Sentiment

Large Certificate Footprint (870 subdomains)

Certificate Transparency

Domain in 10 Threat Intelligence Pulses

Threat Intelligence (OTX)

Clean IP Reputation

IP Reputation

Clean Safe Browsing Status

Malware & Phishing Check

Clean Website Security Scan

Website Security Scan

Certification Claimed: ISO 27001

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Certification Claimed: GDPR (In Progress)

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Subprocessor Page Found, No Entries Parsed

Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery

Not Found as FDIC-Insured Institution

FDIC Institution Check

No SEC Enforcement Filings Found

SEC Filing Search

SOC 2 Compliance Claimed on Trust Page

Certification Registry Verification

AI Data Retention Policy Not Specified

AI Data Usage Policy

Deep Document Crawler Results

Deep Document Analysis

Recommended Actions

Steps to address findings for SAP

  1. 1

    Request ISO 27001 certificate documentation from SAP's security team within 30 days — ask for the certificate number, issuing body, scope, and expiry date, then cross-reference against the IAF CertSearch registry (https://www.iafcertsearch.org) using the exact legal entity name on the certificate.

  2. 2

    Request SAP's SOC 2 Type II report and bridge letter — contact your SAP account manager or access the SAP Trust Center portal (https://www.sap.com/about/trust-center.html) after signing an NDA; confirm the audit period covers the last 12 months and that the scope includes the specific SAP products in your deployment.

  3. 3

    Initiate the AI training opt-out via the SAP for Me interface before go-live — confirm with your SAP account team which AI features are enabled by default for your contract, document the opt-out confirmation, and include AI data handling terms in your Data Processing Agreement review.

  4. 4

    Manually review the subprocessor list at https://sap.com/privacy/subprocessors — if the page format is inaccessible, request a current subprocessor list in PDF or spreadsheet format from your account team and verify that subprocessors with access to your data are subject to appropriate data protection agreements.

  5. 5

    Ask SAP's security team to provide the HTTP Observatory or equivalent security header scan results for the application endpoint (accounts.sap.com or the subdomain your organization will use) to confirm whether the D- grade on the marketing site reflects the actual application security posture.

  6. 6

    Monitor the o9 Solutions trade secret lawsuit docket over the next 90 days and request SAP's standard legal disclosure or vendor questionnaire response confirming no active regulatory sanctions or enforcement actions affecting your contract obligations.

Intelligence Sources Queried

27 sources in this assessment

27of 27 sources returned data
IP Reputation
AI Data Usage Policy
Threat Intelligence (OTX)
Adverse Media Scan
Certification Registry Verification
Certificate Transparency
Deep Document Analysis
Domain Analysis
FDIC Institution Check
Business Registration
Historical Media Search
Tech Community Sentiment
Company Intelligence
Adverse Media Scan (Fallback)
HTTP Security Scan
Sanctions & Watchlist Screening
AI Research Agent
Malware & Phishing Check
SEC Filing Search
Infrastructure Exposure
SSL/TLS Analysis
Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery
Trust & Compliance Page Scan
Website Security Scan
Threat Intelligence
Web Archive History
Domain Registration

Data Coverage Notes

Some data sources may have had limited availability during this assessment. This does not reflect negatively on the vendor.

  • The subprocessor page at sap.com was located but could not be parsed by automated means, leaving the individual subprocessor list unconfirmed. Manual review is required.
  • The Web archive service provider returned an anomalous first-seen date of April 2026 for sap.com, which is inconsistent with the domain's confirmed registration date of 1995 and 31-year history. This data point reflects a provider-side indexing artifact and should not be interpreted as a new web presence.
  • ISO 27001 registry verification via IAF CertSearch returned no result for SAP, which may reflect entity naming differences or registry coverage limitations rather than confirmed absence of certification. Manual certificate request is the definitive resolution path.
  • The HTTP Observatory scan was performed on the marketing site (sap.com). Application and API endpoints (e.g., accounts.sap.com) may carry different security header configurations and were not independently scanned in this assessment.
  • AI data retention periods for SAP's AI processing were not specified in publicly available policy documentation, limiting the completeness of the AI data handling assessment.
  • The Legal Entity Registry legal entity search returned a low-confidence match (disambiguation score 30/100) for an unrelated Slovenian entity sharing a partial name. No verified LEI record for SAP SE was confirmed through this assessment.
  • Google News adverse media surfaced a 2025 cyberattack article; however, the specific article URL is a Google News redirect and could not be verified as a stable direct link. The event is referenced based on the article title and source metadata available in the evidence.
183+
Vendors assessed
98%
Average confidence
<2 min
Time to report
What a ThirdProof assessment covers

Sanctions Screening

Is SAP on any OFAC, EU, or UN sanctions list? Are any officers or affiliates flagged?

Cyber Risk Assessment

What is SAP's security posture? Threat intelligence scanning, known vulnerabilities, and security header analysis.

Business Registration

Is SAP a legitimately registered business entity? Corporate status, jurisdiction, and officer verification.

Adverse Media Analysis

Has SAP appeared in negative news coverage? Data breaches, lawsuits, regulatory actions, and complaints.

Domain & Infrastructure

Is SAP's website secure? TLS configuration, DNS hygiene, security headers, and domain age analysis.

Company Intelligence

What are SAP's firmographics? Employee count, industry classification, technology stack, and corporate structure.

Trust & Compliance Verification

Does SAP claim SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST, or FedRAMP? ThirdProof scans trust pages for certification claims and cross-references the FedRAMP public registry for independent verification.

Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery

Who does SAP depend on? ThirdProof discovers subprocessors from vendor-published pages and runs sanctions screening and safe browsing checks against each one.

Regulatory & Financial Filings

Has SAP appeared in SEC enforcement filings? Is it associated with any FDIC bank failures? ThirdProof searches regulatory databases with entity verification to confirm attribution.

Full methodology, rule engine, and AI disclosure: /methodology

Seeing this in an audit? ThirdProof lets you investigate SAP and every other vendor in your stack — average report time: 7 minutes. Get SAP's Full Report Free →

Frequently asked about SAP

Is SAP FedRAMP authorized?+
SAP is not currently listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace as of April 2026.
Does SAP have SOC 2 Type II?+
No SOC 2 found. SAP rated Moderate Risk — adverse media detected. See all 6 findings →
Is SAP on the OFAC sanctions list?+
SAP returned no matches in ThirdProof's OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening as of April 2026.
What is SAP's vendor risk tier?+
ThirdProof assigned SAP a risk tier of Moderate Risk with 100% confidence based on assessment across 27 intelligence sources as of April 2026.
Can I get an auto-filled security questionnaire for SAP?+
Yes. Every ThirdProof investigation of SAP produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and a 133-question security questionnaire pre-filled with evidence from 27 independent sources. The questionnaire is mapped to SIG, SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS and 9 other frameworks — answered without sending SAP a single email or waiting for a vendor response.
Is SAP safe to use as a vendor?+
SAP is a enterprise software vendor that handles organizational data. Safety depends on their current security posture, certification status, and how they handle your specific data. ThirdProof automates this evaluation across 27 intelligence sources — sanctions databases (OFAC, EU, UN), business registration verification, adverse media scanning, and cyber risk assessment — producing a deterministic risk tier with confidence score plus an auto-filled security questionnaire. Run a free investigation to see SAP's full risk profile.
Does SAP have SOC 2 certification?+
No SOC 2 found. SAP rated Moderate Risk — adverse media detected. See all 6 findings →
Has SAP had any data breaches?+
Data breach history is an important signal for any vendor, particularly enterprise software platforms like SAP that handle organizational data. ThirdProof's adverse media analysis searches multiple news APIs and public records for data breaches, security incidents, lawsuits, regulatory enforcement actions, and financial distress signals. Each finding is linked to its original source with severity classification.
Is SAP on any sanctions lists?+
Sanctions screening is standard due diligence for enterprise software vendors. ThirdProof screens SAP against OFAC SDN, consolidated international sanctions lists, and PEP databases. The screening uses entity name verification to reduce false positives. If SAP or any associated officers appear on a sanctions list, this triggers automatic escalation to the highest risk tier.
How do I assess SAP for vendor risk?+
Assessing SAP as a enterprise software vendor involves verifying SOC 2 Type II and applicable industry standards compliance, reviewing their subprocessor chain, and checking sanctions exposure. ThirdProof automates this across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — no questionnaires or vendor participation required. Your first 5 investigations are free.
How long does a ThirdProof assessment take?+
A ThirdProof assessment completes in an average of 7 minutes. 27 intelligence sources are queried in parallel — sanctions databases, business registries, threat intelligence feeds, certificate transparency logs, and more. The result is a deterministic risk tier with confidence score and audit-ready PDF report.
Is ThirdProof free?+
ThirdProof offers 5 free vendor assessments with no credit card required. Each assessment includes the full report — risk tier, confidence score, individual findings, executive summary, and PDF export. Paid plans start at $399/month for teams that need ongoing vendor monitoring.
Can I use a ThirdProof report as SOC 2 audit evidence?+
Yes. ThirdProof reports are designed to satisfy SOC 2 CC9.2 (vendor risk management) requirements. Each report includes SHA-256 integrity verification, methodology disclosure, source attribution for every finding, and AI content labeling. Auditors can independently verify the report's authenticity and trace each finding to its original source.
How is ThirdProof different from a security questionnaire?+
Security questionnaires require vendor participation, take weeks, and produce self-reported answers. ThirdProof queries 27 independent intelligence sources — no vendor involvement needed. Risk tiers are assigned by a deterministic rules engine (not AI opinion), and every finding links to its original source. You get an audit-ready report in an average of 7 minutes instead of waiting weeks for a questionnaire response.

SAP is in your vendor stack. Can you prove you assessed them?

SOC 2 CC9.2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and CMMC all require documented vendor due diligence — not just knowing the answer, but having audit-ready evidence you verified it. Most compliance teams can't produce that documentation on demand.

ThirdProof investigates SAP across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — sanctions screening, cyber posture, SOC 2 verification, FedRAMP status, and more. Every investigation produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire your prospects and auditors expect to see.

✓ 5 free investigations✓ Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire✓ No credit card required✓ Average report time: 7 minutes

Replaces $600–$900 in manual compliance consulting time per vendor assessed.