Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Rippling Vendor Risk Assessment — Full Report

Before you share customer data with Rippling, your compliance team needs documented proof they can be trusted. ThirdProof investigated Rippling across 27 intelligence sources — here's what we found.

⚠ FedRAMP Status: Not found in the FedRAMP Marketplace. Vendors handling government data or CUI must be FedRAMP authorized.

Risk Tier
Tier 3Moderate Risk
SOC 2
⚠ Vendor Attested
FedRAMP
— Not Authorized
Last Assessed
Mar 25, 2026
🟢IP Reputation: Abuse score: 0%, 0 reports🟡SSL/TLS: TLSv1.3🟢Domain Age: 24.1 years🟢Infrastructure: 2 open ports, 0 CVEs
FedRAMP Status
Rippling is not listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace as of March 2026.
SOC 2 Status
Rippling has a SOC 2 claim detected on their trust page. Claim is vendor-attested — no public registry exists for independent verification.
Sanctions Screening
Rippling returned no matches in OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening.
Risk Tier
ThirdProof assigned Rippling a Moderate Risk tier with 98% confidence across 27 intelligence sources.

24 sources queried. 98% confidence. Every Rippling investigation produces both a risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire — no vendor follow-up required.

Get Rippling's Full Report Free →
5 free investigations|Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire|Avg. 7 minutes

Certification & Compliance Status

Need a complete vendor security questionnaire?

Run a full ThirdProof investigation to get 133 security questions auto-filled with source evidence — ready for your next audit or vendor onboarding review.

Get Rippling's Full Report Free →
Not Listed on FedRAMP Marketplace

Verified against FedRAMP Marketplace API as of March 2026

Organizations with federal compliance requirements should verify this directly at marketplace.fedramp.gov.

Rippling is not listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace.

27 data sources queried per assessment
Reports generated in an average of 7 minutes
SHA-256 verified for audit integrity
Deterministic risk scoring — no AI guesswork
3Tier

Moderate Risk

Rippling

Vendor Risk Assessment

Confidence Score98%

Based on data availability and source coverage

24

Sources Queried

24

Sources With Data

March 25, 2026

Last Assessed

Executive Summary

AI-generated analysis for Rippling

Rippling (rippling.com) is a well-established workforce management platform offering HR, IT, and Finance capabilities, assessed at Tier 3 (Moderate Risk) with a 98% confidence score based on comprehensive external evidence across 24 data sources. Rippling demonstrates several meaningful positive signals consistent with a mature enterprise SaaS vendor:

Key Findings

  • Domain established for 24+ years, registered with enterprise-grade MarkMonitor and protected through 2030
  • Clean threat posture: not listed on any malware blacklists (SURBL, Spamhaus DBL, URLhaus), zero Malware detection service threats, and a clean IP reputation with 0% abuse score
  • Minimal infrastructure exposure with only 2 open ports (80, 443) behind Cloudflare — significantly below the SaaS industry average of 8–12 open ports, with zero known CVEs
  • A broad set of compliance certifications claimed on the vendor's public security page (https://rippling.com/security), including SOC 2 Type II, SOC 1 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27018, CSA STAR Level 2, GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA — all vendor-attested with a SOC 2 trust report available via Whistic at https://trust.rippling.com
  • No sanctions matches across OFAC, EU, and UN watchlists; no adverse media signals; no SEC or regulatory enforcement findings Three areas require attention before finalizing vendor approval:
  • All eight claimed certifications are vendor-attested and could not be independently confirmed through public registries during this assessment; the SOC 2 Type II report and ISO 27001 certificate should be requested directly from Rippling's security team
  • The subprocessor page at https://trust.rippling.com/subprocessors was found but contains placeholder content with no identifiable subprocessors listed — a material gap for GDPR Article 28 due diligence given Rippling's medium data access level
  • Rippling's marketing site (rippling.com) received a C+ grade on HTTP security header testing, with Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options headers absent; the application endpoint (app.rippling.com) should be verified separately
  • No publicly discoverable AI data usage policy was found, which is relevant given Rippling's expanding AI features Overall, Rippling presents as a credible, long-standing enterprise vendor with a strong compliance posture on paper, but several verification gaps — particularly around certifications, subprocessor transparency, and AI data handling — warrant conditional approval pending confirmation of the items noted above.

Independence Statement

All evidence in this report was independently sourced from external data providers, public registries, and open-source intelligence without vendor participation or input.

Investigation Findings

6 findings identified for Rippling

6 medium
medium

Recently Registered Entity

RIPPLING STREAM LAND PARTNERS, LTD. was first registered in the LEI system less than 1 year ago (2026-03-16T12:41:13Z).

medium

Missing Security Headers

rippling.com is missing 2 recommended security headers: Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options.

medium

Tech Community Discussion: legal

2 Hacker News stories about "Rippling" related to legal. Top story: "Deel's CEO is now in Dubai, complicating Rippling's lawsuit" (4 points).

medium

HTTP Security Grade: C+

rippling.com received a mediocre grade (C+). Some security headers are configured but improvements are needed. Note: This scan was performed on the marketing site (rippling.com). The application endpoint (app.rippling.com) may have different security headers. Verify the application domain separately.

medium

Multiple Certificate Issuers (39)

rippling.com has certificates from 39 different Certificate Authorities. This may indicate inconsistent certificate management practices.

medium

AI Data Usage Policy Not Discoverable at Standard Paths

An AI-specific data usage policy was not discoverable for rippling.com through automated scanning of common policy paths and web search. The vendor may publish relevant data handling commitments in enterprise agreement documents (DPAs, product terms, licensing portals) that are not indexed at standard public URLs. Request the vendor's Data Protection Addendum or AI-specific terms directly.

Security Strengths

27 positive signals verified

Legal Entity Actively Registered

Business Registration

No Sanctions Matches Found

Sanctions & Watchlist Screening

No Adverse Media Signals

Adverse Media Scan (Fallback)

Firmographic Data Available

Company Intelligence

Valid SSL Certificate

Domain Analysis

2 Open Ports Detected

Infrastructure Exposure

Established Domain (24+ years)

Domain Registration

Clean domain reputation

Threat Intelligence

Large Certificate Footprint (120 subdomains)

Certificate Transparency

Established Web Presence (23+ years)

Web Archive History

Domain in 4 Threat Intelligence Pulses

Threat Intelligence (OTX)

Clean IP Reputation

IP Reputation

Clean Safe Browsing Status

Malware & Phishing Check

Clean Website Security Scan

Website Security Scan

Certification Claimed: SOC 2

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Certification Claimed: SOC 1

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Certification Claimed: ISO 27001

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Certification Claimed: ISO 27018

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Certification Claimed: GDPR

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Certification Claimed: CCPA

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Certification Claimed: CSA STAR

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Certification Claimed: HIPAA

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Subprocessor Page Found (Placeholder)

Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery

Not Found as FDIC-Insured Institution

FDIC Institution Check

No SEC Enforcement Filings Found

SEC Filing Search

No Historical Adverse Media Found

Historical Media Search

SOC 2 Compliance Claimed on Trust Page

Certification Registry Verification

Recommended Actions

Steps to address findings for Rippling

  1. 1

    Request Rippling's SOC 2 Type II report and bridge letter directly from their security team or via their Whistic trust portal at https://trust.rippling.com — allow up to 5 business days and verify the report period covers the past 12 months.

  2. 2

    Request Rippling's ISO 27001 certificate from their security team, confirming the issuing certification body, certificate number, scope statement, and expiry date — cross-reference the issuing body against the IAF CertSearch registry at https://www.iafcertsearch.org.

  3. 3

    Contact Rippling's privacy or legal team to request a complete and current subprocessor list per GDPR Article 28, referencing the placeholder page at https://trust.rippling.com/subprocessors — set a 30-day deadline and require this to be resolved before processing personal data through the platform.

  4. 4

    Request Rippling's Data Protection Addendum and any AI-specific product terms — ask specifically whether customer data is used to train AI or ML models, which third-party AI providers are involved, and what data retention periods apply to AI-processed inputs.

  5. 5

    Verify the HTTP security header configuration of the application endpoint (app.rippling.com) separately — your IT or security team can use HTTP security scanner at https://observatory.mozilla.org/analyze/app.rippling.com to check the application domain's header grade.

  6. 6

    Document the Rippling vs. Deel litigation context in your vendor risk register — note that Rippling is the plaintiff alleging trade secret theft, and monitor for material case developments quarterly via Google News alerts for 'Rippling Deel lawsuit'.

Intelligence Sources Queried

24 sources in this assessment

24of 24 sources returned data
IP Reputation
AI Data Usage Policy
Threat Intelligence (OTX)
Certification Registry Verification
Certificate Transparency
Domain Analysis
FDIC Institution Check
Business Registration
Historical Media Search
Tech Community Sentiment
Company Intelligence
Adverse Media Scan (Fallback)
HTTP Security Scan
Sanctions & Watchlist Screening
Malware & Phishing Check
SEC Filing Search
Infrastructure Exposure
SSL/TLS Analysis
Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery
Trust & Compliance Page Scan
Website Security Scan
Threat Intelligence
Web Archive History
Domain Registration

Data Coverage Notes

Some data sources may have had limited availability during this assessment. This does not reflect negatively on the vendor.

  • External cyber risk scoring was not available from all sources during this assessment; findings rely on the available threat intelligence sources, which are considered sufficient for a high-confidence rating.
  • The subprocessor page at trust.rippling.com was accessible but contained placeholder content — no supply chain risk assessment of individual subprocessors was possible.
  • Independent certification registry verification for ISO 27001 (IAF CertSearch) and HITRUST (certified entity directory) returned no results; it is possible registrations exist under subsidiary or trading names not matched by automated search.
  • HTTP security header analysis was performed on the marketing domain (rippling.com); the application endpoint (app.rippling.com) was not scanned and may have a different, potentially stronger, security header configuration.
  • The Legal Entity Registry LEI match for 'RIPPLING STREAM LAND PARTNERS, LTD.' (US-OH) returned a disambiguation score of 76/100 with name match unverified — this entity is likely unrelated to Rippling Inc. (San Francisco, CA) and should not be interpreted as findings about the vendor under investigation.
  • Hacker News discussion threads referencing Rippling's lawsuit against Deel reflect ongoing litigation in which Rippling is the plaintiff — full legal context and outcome are not determinable from community discussion alone.
183+
Vendors assessed
98%
Average confidence
<2 min
Time to report
What a ThirdProof assessment covers

Sanctions Screening

Is Rippling on any OFAC, EU, or UN sanctions list? Are any officers or affiliates flagged?

Cyber Risk Assessment

What is Rippling's security posture? Threat intelligence scanning, known vulnerabilities, and security header analysis.

Business Registration

Is Rippling a legitimately registered business entity? Corporate status, jurisdiction, and officer verification.

Adverse Media Analysis

Has Rippling appeared in negative news coverage? Data breaches, lawsuits, regulatory actions, and complaints.

Domain & Infrastructure

Is Rippling's website secure? TLS configuration, DNS hygiene, security headers, and domain age analysis.

Company Intelligence

What are Rippling's firmographics? Employee count, industry classification, technology stack, and corporate structure.

Trust & Compliance Verification

Does Rippling claim SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST, or FedRAMP? ThirdProof scans trust pages for certification claims and cross-references the FedRAMP public registry for independent verification.

Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery

Who does Rippling depend on? ThirdProof discovers subprocessors from vendor-published pages and runs sanctions screening and safe browsing checks against each one.

Regulatory & Financial Filings

Has Rippling appeared in SEC enforcement filings? Is it associated with any FDIC bank failures? ThirdProof searches regulatory databases with entity verification to confirm attribution.

Full methodology, rule engine, and AI disclosure: /methodology

Seeing this in an audit? ThirdProof lets you investigate Rippling and every other vendor in your stack — average report time: 7 minutes. Get Rippling's Full Report Free →

Frequently asked about Rippling

Is Rippling FedRAMP authorized?+
Rippling is not currently listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace as of March 2026.
Does Rippling have SOC 2 Type II?+
Yes — Rippling holds SOC 2 (Type II not confirmed). Rated Moderate Risk — subprocessor page incomplete. See all 5 findings →
Is Rippling on the OFAC sanctions list?+
Rippling returned no matches in ThirdProof's OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening as of March 2026.
What is Rippling's vendor risk tier?+
ThirdProof assigned Rippling a risk tier of Moderate Risk with 98% confidence based on assessment across 27 intelligence sources as of March 2026.
Can I get an auto-filled security questionnaire for Rippling?+
Yes. Every ThirdProof investigation of Rippling produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and a 133-question security questionnaire pre-filled with evidence from 27 independent sources. The questionnaire is mapped to SIG, SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS and 9 other frameworks — answered without sending Rippling a single email or waiting for a vendor response.
Is Rippling safe to use as a vendor?+
Rippling is a HR vendor that handles employee PII and compensation data. Safety depends on their current security posture, certification status, and how they handle your specific data. ThirdProof automates this evaluation across 27 intelligence sources — sanctions databases (OFAC, EU, UN), business registration verification, adverse media scanning, and cyber risk assessment — producing a deterministic risk tier with confidence score plus an auto-filled security questionnaire. Run a free investigation to see Rippling's full risk profile.
Does Rippling have SOC 2 certification?+
Yes — Rippling holds SOC 2 + 6 other certs. Rated Moderate Risk — subprocessor page incomplete. See all 5 findings →
Has Rippling had any data breaches?+
Data breach history is an important signal for any vendor, particularly HR platforms like Rippling that handle employee PII and compensation data. ThirdProof's adverse media analysis searches multiple news APIs and public records for data breaches, security incidents, lawsuits, regulatory enforcement actions, and financial distress signals. Each finding is linked to its original source with severity classification.
Is Rippling on any sanctions lists?+
Sanctions screening is standard due diligence for HR vendors. ThirdProof screens Rippling against OFAC SDN, consolidated international sanctions lists, and PEP databases. The screening uses entity name verification to reduce false positives. If Rippling or any associated officers appear on a sanctions list, this triggers automatic escalation to the highest risk tier.
How do I assess Rippling for vendor risk?+
Assessing Rippling as a HR vendor involves verifying SOC 2 Type II and GDPR/data privacy compliance, reviewing their subprocessor chain, and checking sanctions exposure. ThirdProof automates this across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — no questionnaires or vendor participation required. Your first 5 investigations are free.
How long does a ThirdProof assessment take?+
A ThirdProof assessment completes in an average of 7 minutes. 27 intelligence sources are queried in parallel — sanctions databases, business registries, threat intelligence feeds, certificate transparency logs, and more. The result is a deterministic risk tier with confidence score and audit-ready PDF report.
Is ThirdProof free?+
ThirdProof offers 5 free vendor assessments with no credit card required. Each assessment includes the full report — risk tier, confidence score, individual findings, executive summary, and PDF export. Paid plans start at $399/month for teams that need ongoing vendor monitoring.
Can I use a ThirdProof report as SOC 2 audit evidence?+
Yes. ThirdProof reports are designed to satisfy SOC 2 CC9.2 (vendor risk management) requirements. Each report includes SHA-256 integrity verification, methodology disclosure, source attribution for every finding, and AI content labeling. Auditors can independently verify the report's authenticity and trace each finding to its original source.
How is ThirdProof different from a security questionnaire?+
Security questionnaires require vendor participation, take weeks, and produce self-reported answers. ThirdProof queries 27 independent intelligence sources — no vendor involvement needed. Risk tiers are assigned by a deterministic rules engine (not AI opinion), and every finding links to its original source. You get an audit-ready report in an average of 7 minutes instead of waiting weeks for a questionnaire response.

Rippling is in your vendor stack. Can you prove you assessed them?

SOC 2 CC9.2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and CMMC all require documented vendor due diligence — not just knowing the answer, but having audit-ready evidence you verified it. Most compliance teams can't produce that documentation on demand.

ThirdProof investigates Rippling across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — sanctions screening, cyber posture, SOC 2 verification, FedRAMP status, and more. Every investigation produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire your prospects and auditors expect to see.

✓ 5 free investigations✓ Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire✓ No credit card required✓ Average report time: 7 minutes

Replaces $600–$900 in manual compliance consulting time per vendor assessed.