Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Razorpay Vendor Risk Assessment — Full Report

India-headquartered · RBI regulated

Before you share customer data with Razorpay, your compliance team needs documented proof they can be trusted. ThirdProof investigated Razorpay across 27 intelligence sources — here's what we found.

Risk Tier
Tier 4Low Risk
SOC 2
— Not Found
FedRAMP
— Not Authorized
Last Assessed
Mar 25, 2026
🟢IP Reputation: Abuse score: 0%, 0 reports🟡SSL/TLS: TLSv1.3🟢Infrastructure: 2 open ports, 0 CVEs🟢Sanctions: Clear — No matches found
SOC 2 Status
Razorpay has not had a SOC 2 claim detected on their trust page.
Sanctions Screening
Razorpay returned no matches in OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening.
Risk Tier
ThirdProof assigned Razorpay a Low Risk tier with 72% confidence across 27 intelligence sources.

24 sources queried. 72% confidence. Every Razorpay investigation produces both a risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire — no vendor follow-up required.

Get Razorpay's Full Report Free →
5 free investigations|Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire|Avg. 7 minutes

Certification & Compliance Status

Need a complete vendor security questionnaire?

Run a full ThirdProof investigation to get 133 security questions auto-filled with source evidence — ready for your next audit or vendor onboarding review.

Get Razorpay's Full Report Free →
27 data sources queried per assessment
Reports generated in an average of 7 minutes
SHA-256 verified for audit integrity
Deterministic risk scoring — no AI guesswork
4Tier

Low Risk

Razorpay

Vendor Risk Assessment

Confidence Score72%

Based on data availability and source coverage

24

Sources Queried

19

Sources With Data

March 25, 2026

Last Assessed

Executive Summary

AI-generated analysis for Razorpay

Razorpay (razorpay.com), operating as RAZORPAY SOFTWARE LIMITED (LEI: 335800MPTXBI8YNP7245, registered in India), has been assessed as a Tier 4 (Low Risk) vendor with a confidence score of 72%. Razorpay is a prominent Indian payment infrastructure platform, and this assessment reflects a broadly clean risk profile across technical, reputational, and sanctions dimensions. Several positive signals support the low-risk determination:

Key Findings

  • Razorpay is an active, formally registered legal entity with a verified LEI in good standing.
  • No sanctions matches were identified across OFAC, EU, UN, and other major watchlists.
  • Domain reputation is clean across SURBL, Spamhaus DBL, URLhaus, and Malware detection service, with zero abuse reports on the primary CDN IP.
  • Infrastructure exposure is minimal: only 2 open ports (80 and 443) are exposed, zero known CVEs are associated with the infrastructure, and the domain is served via Cloudflare CDN — representing a well-controlled footprint significantly below the SaaS industry average of 8–12 open ports.
  • The vendor explicitly commits to not training AI models on customer data, discloses third-party AI providers (OpenAI and Anthropic), and claims a zero-retention posture for AI-processed data — all positive signals for data-sensitive buyers.
  • No adverse media was found in historical or recent searches, and Hacker News community discussion shows no risk signals. Two areas warrant attention before or shortly after onboarding:
  • The subprocessor page at trust.razorpay.com/subprocessors exists but appears to contain placeholder content, with no individual subprocessors enumerable. For a payment platform handling medium-level data access, a complete GDPR Article 28-compliant subprocessor list is a material due diligence requirement.
  • No compliance certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HITRUST, or FedRAMP) were identified through trust page scanning or independent public registry verification. Given that Razorpay is a payment infrastructure vendor, PCI DSS certification is a particularly important signal that buyers should verify directly. The HTTP security grade of C+ on the marketing site (razorpay.com) also suggests some header configuration gaps, though the application dashboard may be separately hardened. Overall, Razorpay presents as a low-risk vendor with a clean external profile and strong AI data handling commitments. The primary gaps — incomplete subprocessor disclosure and unverifiable compliance certifications — are addressable through direct engagement with the vendor's security team and do not in themselves elevate the risk tier.

Independence Statement

All evidence in this report was independently sourced from external data providers, public registries, and open-source intelligence without vendor participation or input.

Investigation Findings

2 findings identified for Razorpay

2 medium
medium

Adverse Media Scan Unavailable

A critical data source was unavailable during this investigation. Manual verification is recommended.

Source:Adverse Media Scan (Fallback)
medium

HTTP Security Grade: C+

razorpay.com received a mediocre grade (C+). Some security headers are configured but improvements are needed. Note: This scan was performed on the marketing site (razorpay.com). The application endpoint (dashboard.razorpay.com) may have different security headers. Verify the application domain separately.

Security Strengths

24 positive signals verified

Legal Entity Actively Registered

Business Registration

No Sanctions Matches Found

Sanctions & Watchlist Screening

Firmographic Data Available

Company Intelligence

Domain Infrastructure Healthy

Domain Analysis

Valid SSL Certificate

Domain Analysis

2 Open Ports Detected

Infrastructure Exposure

Domain Registration Unavailable

Domain Registration

Clean domain reputation

Threat Intelligence

Minimal Tech Community Discussion

Tech Community Sentiment

Certificate Data from TLS Handshake

Certificate Transparency

Web Archive History Unavailable

Web Archive History

Domain in 10 Threat Intelligence Pulses

Threat Intelligence (OTX)

Clean IP Reputation

IP Reputation

Clean Safe Browsing Status

Malware & Phishing Check

Clean Website Security Scan

Website Security Scan

Trust Page Found, No Certifications Detected

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Subprocessor Page Found (Placeholder)

Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery

Not Found as FDIC-Insured Institution

FDIC Institution Check

SEC Filing Search Unavailable

SEC Filing Search

No Historical Adverse Media Found

Historical Media Search

SOC 2 Compliance Not Publicly Verifiable

Certification Registry Verification

Vendor Commits to Not Training on Customer Data

AI Data Usage Policy

Third-Party AI Providers Disclosed

AI Data Usage Policy

Zero Data Retention for AI Processing

AI Data Usage Policy

Recommended Actions

Steps to address findings for Razorpay

  1. 1

    Request Razorpay's current SOC 2 Type II report and bridge letter — contact their security team directly via their trust portal at https://trust.razorpay.com or email security@razorpay.com. Many vendors share these reports under a mutual NDA, so be prepared to execute one.

  2. 2

    Request Razorpay's PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance (AoC) or Service Provider listing, particularly if your organization processes payments through their platform. Ask their compliance team for the most recent AoC signed by a Qualified Security Assessor (QSA).

  3. 3

    Request a complete and current subprocessor list directly from Razorpay's legal or security team — check https://trust.razorpay.com/subprocessors for updates, as the page infrastructure exists but currently shows placeholder content. Confirm processing locations, data types, and notification procedures for subprocessor changes.

  4. 4

    Verify the application-layer security headers on Razorpay's dashboard endpoint (dashboard.razorpay.com) using HTTP security scanner at https://observatory.mozilla.org/analyze/dashboard.razorpay.com — the marketing site received a C+ grade, and application-layer posture may differ.

  5. 5

    Review Razorpay's AI data usage policy at https://razorpay.com/privacy-policy/ and confirm with their security team that the zero-retention and no-training commitments extend contractually to their third-party AI providers (OpenAI and Anthropic), and that applicable data processing agreements are in place with those providers.

  6. 6

    Conduct a supplementary manual adverse media search for 'Razorpay' covering the past 12 months using Google News and LinkedIn, given that the primary automated adverse media source was unavailable during this investigation.

Intelligence Sources Queried

24 sources in this assessment

19of 24 sources returned data
IP Reputation
AI Data Usage Policy
Threat Intelligence (OTX)
Certification Registry Verification
Domain Analysis
FDIC Institution Check
Business Registration
Historical Media Search
Tech Community Sentiment
Company Intelligence
HTTP Security Scan
Sanctions & Watchlist Screening
Malware & Phishing Check
Infrastructure Exposure
SSL/TLS Analysis
Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery
Trust & Compliance Page Scan
Website Security Scan
Threat Intelligence
Certificate Transparency
Adverse Media Scan (Fallback)
SEC Filing Search
Web Archive History
Domain Registration

Data Coverage Notes

Some data sources may have had limited availability during this assessment. This does not reflect negatively on the vendor.

  • Adverse media scan from the primary news data source was unavailable during this investigation. Historical media search via Google News returned no adverse results, but buyers with elevated media monitoring requirements should conduct a supplementary manual search covering the past 12 months.
  • Domain registration history (WHOIS data) was unavailable due to a source issue. Domain age and registrar details could not be independently verified; however, Razorpay is a well-established company with an active LEI registered in 2019 and broad public visibility.
  • Web archive history was unavailable during this investigation, limiting independent corroboration of domain establishment date.
  • Certificate Transparency log data (Certificate Transparency service) was only partially available — subdomain enumeration via CT logs could not be completed. Basic certificate data was confirmed via direct TLS connection.
  • External cyber risk scoring was not available during this investigation, which modestly reduces confidence in the overall infrastructure assessment.
  • The HTTP security scan was performed on the marketing site (razorpay.com). The application endpoint (dashboard.razorpay.com) may have materially different security header configurations; buyers should verify the application domain separately.
  • SSL/TLS deep analysis returned no detailed cipher suite or protocol findings; the SSL/TLS analysis service full report at ssl analysis service.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=razorpay.com should be reviewed for cipher-level assurance.
  • SEC EDGAR filing search was unavailable during this investigation. This is a supplementary source and does not affect the risk tier; Razorpay is an Indian private company and SEC filing coverage would not be expected.
183+
Vendors assessed
98%
Average confidence
<2 min
Time to report
What a ThirdProof assessment covers

Sanctions Screening

Is Razorpay on any OFAC, EU, or UN sanctions list? Are any officers or affiliates flagged?

Cyber Risk Assessment

What is Razorpay's security posture? Threat intelligence scanning, known vulnerabilities, and security header analysis.

Business Registration

Is Razorpay a legitimately registered business entity? Corporate status, jurisdiction, and officer verification.

Adverse Media Analysis

Has Razorpay appeared in negative news coverage? Data breaches, lawsuits, regulatory actions, and complaints.

Domain & Infrastructure

Is Razorpay's website secure? TLS configuration, DNS hygiene, security headers, and domain age analysis.

Company Intelligence

What are Razorpay's firmographics? Employee count, industry classification, technology stack, and corporate structure.

Trust & Compliance Verification

Does Razorpay claim SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST, or FedRAMP? ThirdProof scans trust pages for certification claims and cross-references the FedRAMP public registry for independent verification.

Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery

Who does Razorpay depend on? ThirdProof discovers subprocessors from vendor-published pages and runs sanctions screening and safe browsing checks against each one.

Regulatory & Financial Filings

Has Razorpay appeared in SEC enforcement filings? Is it associated with any FDIC bank failures? ThirdProof searches regulatory databases with entity verification to confirm attribution.

Full methodology, rule engine, and AI disclosure: /methodology

Seeing this in an audit? ThirdProof lets you investigate Razorpay and every other vendor in your stack — average report time: 7 minutes. Get Razorpay's Full Report Free →

Frequently asked about Razorpay

Does Razorpay have SOC 2 Type II?+
No SOC 2 found. Razorpay rated Low Risk — subprocessor page incomplete. See all 5 findings →
Is Razorpay on the OFAC sanctions list?+
Razorpay returned no matches in ThirdProof's OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening as of March 2026.
What is Razorpay's vendor risk tier?+
ThirdProof assigned Razorpay a risk tier of Low Risk with 72% confidence based on assessment across 27 intelligence sources as of March 2026.
Can I get an auto-filled security questionnaire for Razorpay?+
Yes. Every ThirdProof investigation of Razorpay produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and a 133-question security questionnaire pre-filled with evidence from 27 independent sources. The questionnaire is mapped to SIG, SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS and 9 other frameworks — answered without sending Razorpay a single email or waiting for a vendor response.
Is Razorpay safe to use as a vendor?+
Razorpay is a payments vendor that handles payment card and transaction data. Safety depends on their current security posture, certification status, and how they handle your specific data. ThirdProof automates this evaluation across 27 intelligence sources — sanctions databases (OFAC, EU, UN), business registration verification, adverse media scanning, and cyber risk assessment — producing a deterministic risk tier with confidence score plus an auto-filled security questionnaire. Run a free investigation to see Razorpay's full risk profile.
Does Razorpay have SOC 2 certification?+
No SOC 2 found. Razorpay rated Low Risk — subprocessor page incomplete. See all 5 findings →
Is Razorpay FedRAMP authorized?+
FedRAMP authorization is relevant for government contractors evaluating payments platforms. Based on ThirdProof's assessment, Razorpay is not currently listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace. Organizations with federal compliance requirements should verify this directly and consider alternative vendors with FedRAMP authorization where required.
Has Razorpay had any data breaches?+
Data breach history is an important signal for any vendor, particularly payments platforms like Razorpay that handle payment card and transaction data. ThirdProof's adverse media analysis searches multiple news APIs and public records for data breaches, security incidents, lawsuits, regulatory enforcement actions, and financial distress signals. Each finding is linked to its original source with severity classification.
Is Razorpay on any sanctions lists?+
Sanctions screening is particularly critical for payments vendors. ThirdProof screens Razorpay against OFAC SDN, consolidated international sanctions lists, and PEP databases. The screening uses entity name verification to reduce false positives. If Razorpay or any associated officers appear on a sanctions list, this triggers automatic escalation to the highest risk tier.
How do I assess Razorpay for vendor risk?+
Assessing Razorpay as a payments vendor involves verifying PCI-DSS and SOC 2 Type II compliance, reviewing their subprocessor chain, and checking sanctions exposure. ThirdProof automates this across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — no questionnaires or vendor participation required. Your first 5 investigations are free.
How long does a ThirdProof assessment take?+
A ThirdProof assessment completes in an average of 7 minutes. 27 intelligence sources are queried in parallel — sanctions databases, business registries, threat intelligence feeds, certificate transparency logs, and more. The result is a deterministic risk tier with confidence score and audit-ready PDF report.
Is ThirdProof free?+
ThirdProof offers 5 free vendor assessments with no credit card required. Each assessment includes the full report — risk tier, confidence score, individual findings, executive summary, and PDF export. Paid plans start at $399/month for teams that need ongoing vendor monitoring.
Can I use a ThirdProof report as SOC 2 audit evidence?+
Yes. ThirdProof reports are designed to satisfy SOC 2 CC9.2 (vendor risk management) requirements. Each report includes SHA-256 integrity verification, methodology disclosure, source attribution for every finding, and AI content labeling. Auditors can independently verify the report's authenticity and trace each finding to its original source.
How is ThirdProof different from a security questionnaire?+
Security questionnaires require vendor participation, take weeks, and produce self-reported answers. ThirdProof queries 27 independent intelligence sources — no vendor involvement needed. Risk tiers are assigned by a deterministic rules engine (not AI opinion), and every finding links to its original source. You get an audit-ready report in an average of 7 minutes instead of waiting weeks for a questionnaire response.

Razorpay is in your vendor stack. Can you prove you assessed them?

SOC 2 CC9.2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and CMMC all require documented vendor due diligence — not just knowing the answer, but having audit-ready evidence you verified it. Most compliance teams can't produce that documentation on demand.

ThirdProof investigates Razorpay across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — sanctions screening, cyber posture, SOC 2 verification, FedRAMP status, and more. Every investigation produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire your prospects and auditors expect to see.

✓ 5 free investigations✓ Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire✓ No credit card required✓ Average report time: 7 minutes

Replaces $600–$900 in manual compliance consulting time per vendor assessed.