Q37
Do you have a current SOC 2 Type II report?
SOC 2 Type II: claimed_with_trust_page
Before you share customer data with Plaid, your compliance team needs documented proof they can be trusted. ThirdProof investigated Plaid across 27 intelligence sources — here's what we found.
⚠ FedRAMP Status: Not found in the FedRAMP Marketplace. Vendors handling government data or CUI must be FedRAMP authorized.
25 sources queried. 98% confidence. Every Plaid investigation produces both a risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire — no vendor follow-up required.
Get Plaid's Full Report Free →Security Questionnaire — Auto-Filled
Auto-filled from public evidence • 32% complete
Q37
SOC 2 Type II: claimed_with_trust_page
Q38
Plaid is ISO27001 and ISO27701 certified as internationally recognized standards part of their Security and Privacy assurance program.
Q41
Not found in FedRAMP marketplace
Q42
Plaid provides Data Processing Agreements (DPA) with processors and adheres to various data processing requirements on their legal pages.
Q39
Third-party source confirms Plaid maintains PCI DSS compliance as a required financial institution security standard.
+ 4 more compliance questions answered in the full report
Every investigation produces a full PDF report plus the complete 133-question questionnaire, mapped to SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SIG, and more.
Get Plaid's Full Report Free →Verified against FedRAMP Marketplace API as of March 2026
Organizations with federal compliance requirements should verify this directly at marketplace.fedramp.gov.
Plaid is not listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace.
Low Risk
Vendor Risk Assessment
Based on data availability and source coverage
25
Sources Queried
24
Sources With Data
April 6, 2026
Last Assessed
AI-generated analysis for Plaid
Plaid (plaid.com) is a financial data connectivity and fintech infrastructure vendor assessed at Risk Tier 4 (Low Risk) with a 98% confidence score. As a critical-data-access vendor operating at the intersection of banking APIs and consumer financial accounts, this rating reflects a strong overall security posture across identity, infrastructure, and reputation signals. Positive signals across the assessment are numerous and substantive:
Independence Statement
All evidence in this assessment was independently sourced from external data repositories, public registries, and open-source threat intelligence feeds without vendor participation or review.
2 findings identified for Plaid
plaid.com is missing 2 recommended security headers: Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options.
plaid.com received a poor grade (D+) from Mozilla HTTP Observatory. Multiple security headers or configurations are missing. Note: This scan was performed on the marketing site (plaid.com). The application endpoint (secure.plaid.com) may have different security headers. Verify the application domain separately.
23 positive signals verified
Legal Entity Actively Registered
Business Registration →No Sanctions Matches Found
Sanctions & Watchlist Screening →No Adverse Media Found
Adverse Media Scan →No Adverse Media Signals
Adverse Media Scan (Fallback) →Firmographic Data Available
Company Intelligence →Valid SSL Certificate
Domain Analysis →2 Open Ports Detected
Infrastructure Exposure →Established Domain (30+ years)
Domain Registration →Clean domain reputation
Threat Intelligence →Notable Tech Community Presence
Tech Community Sentiment →Minimal Tech Community Discussion
Tech Community Sentiment →Certificate Data from TLS Handshake
Certificate Transparency →Established Web Presence (29+ years)
Web Archive History →Domain in 50 Threat Intelligence Pulses
Threat Intelligence (OTX) →Clean IP Reputation
IP Reputation →Clean Safe Browsing Status
Malware & Phishing Check →Clean Website Security Scan
Website Security Scan →Trust Page Found, No Certifications Detected
Trust & Compliance Page Scan →Subprocessor Page Found, No Entries Parsed
Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery →Not Found as FDIC-Insured Institution
FDIC Institution Check →No SEC Enforcement Filings Found
SEC Filing Search →News Coverage Found (No Risk Signals)
Historical Media Search →SOC 2 Compliance Claimed on Trust Page
Certification Registry Verification →Steps to address findings for Plaid
Request Plaid's current SOC 2 Type II report (dated within the last 12 months) and a bridge letter covering any gap period since the report date. Contact Plaid's security team directly or check their compliance portal — many fintech vendors provide reports via their trust page at https://plaid.com/security or https://security.plaid.com upon execution of an NDA.
Manually review the subprocessor disclosure at https://plaid.com/open-banking/ to identify all named third-party data processors. Confirm that your Data Processing Agreement (DPA) with Plaid covers all listed subprocessors and that subprocessor changes are subject to advance notice obligations.
Verify the application security posture of secure.plaid.com (the API/application endpoint identified during scanning) separately from the marketing site. Request Plaid's most recent penetration test executive summary or security attestation covering the application layer — ask their security team for a summary or check https://security.plaid.com.
Request Plaid's written AI and machine learning data usage policy, specifically asking whether customer financial data is used to train models, what retention periods apply to API-processed data, and whether an opt-out mechanism is available. Reference their legal page at https://plaid.com/legal/ as a starting point for the conversation.
Retain this assessment report with a reviewer signature and date to satisfy SOC 2 CC9.2 third-party risk management evidence requirements. File alongside the Plaid SOC 2 Type II report and DPA in your vendor risk register.
Document complementary user entity controls (CUECs) applicable to your integration with Plaid — specifically controls around API key management, OAuth token lifecycle, and user consent flows — as these will be in scope for your own SOC 2 auditor if Plaid is within your audit boundary.
25 sources in this assessment
Some data sources may have had limited availability during this assessment. This does not reflect negatively on the vendor.
Are you Plaid? Claim this profile to complete your security record. Buyers are reviewing this profile now.
Claim this profile →Is Plaid on any OFAC, EU, or UN sanctions list? Are any officers or affiliates flagged?
What is Plaid's security posture? Threat intelligence scanning, known vulnerabilities, and security header analysis.
Is Plaid a legitimately registered business entity? Corporate status, jurisdiction, and officer verification.
Has Plaid appeared in negative news coverage? Data breaches, lawsuits, regulatory actions, and complaints.
Is Plaid's website secure? TLS configuration, DNS hygiene, security headers, and domain age analysis.
What are Plaid's firmographics? Employee count, industry classification, technology stack, and corporate structure.
Does Plaid claim SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST, or FedRAMP? ThirdProof scans trust pages for certification claims and cross-references the FedRAMP public registry for independent verification.
Who does Plaid depend on? ThirdProof discovers subprocessors from vendor-published pages and runs sanctions screening and safe browsing checks against each one.
Has Plaid appeared in SEC enforcement filings? Is it associated with any FDIC bank failures? ThirdProof searches regulatory databases with entity verification to confirm attribution.
Full methodology, rule engine, and AI disclosure: /methodology
Seeing this in an audit? ThirdProof lets you investigate Plaid and every other vendor in your stack — average report time: 7 minutes. Get Plaid's Full Report Free →
SOC 2 CC9.2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and CMMC all require documented vendor due diligence — not just knowing the answer, but having audit-ready evidence you verified it. Most compliance teams can't produce that documentation on demand.
ThirdProof investigates Plaid across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — sanctions screening, cyber posture, SOC 2 verification, FedRAMP status, and more. Every investigation produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire your prospects and auditors expect to see.
Replaces $600–$900 in manual compliance consulting time per vendor assessed.