Skip to main content
Skip to main content

Looker Vendor Risk Assessment — Full Report

Before you share customer data with Looker, your compliance team needs documented proof they can be trusted. ThirdProof investigated Looker across 27 intelligence sources — here's what we found.

⚠ FedRAMP Status: Not found in the FedRAMP Marketplace. Vendors handling government data or CUI must be FedRAMP authorized.

Risk Tier
Tier 3Moderate Risk
SOC 2
— Not Found
FedRAMP
— Not Authorized
Last Assessed
Mar 25, 2026
🟢IP Reputation: Abuse score: 0%, 1 report🟡SSL/TLS: TLSv1.3🟢Domain Age: 28.8 years🟢Infrastructure: 2 open ports, 0 CVEs
FedRAMP Status
Looker is not listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace as of March 2026.
SOC 2 Status
Looker has not had a SOC 2 claim detected on their trust page.
Sanctions Screening
Looker returned no matches in OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening.
Risk Tier
ThirdProof assigned Looker a Moderate Risk tier with 90% confidence across 27 intelligence sources.

24 sources queried. 90% confidence. Every Looker investigation produces both a risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire — no vendor follow-up required.

Get Looker's Full Report Free →
5 free investigations|Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire|Avg. 7 minutes

Certification & Compliance Status

Need a complete vendor security questionnaire?

Run a full ThirdProof investigation to get 133 security questions auto-filled with source evidence — ready for your next audit or vendor onboarding review.

Get Looker's Full Report Free →
Not Listed on FedRAMP Marketplace

Verified against FedRAMP Marketplace API as of March 2026

Organizations with federal compliance requirements should verify this directly at marketplace.fedramp.gov.

Looker (Google Cloud) inherits Google Cloud Platform FedRAMP Moderate authorization.

27 data sources queried per assessment
Reports generated in an average of 7 minutes
SHA-256 verified for audit integrity
Deterministic risk scoring — no AI guesswork
3Tier

Moderate Risk

Looker

Vendor Risk Assessment

Confidence Score90%

Based on data availability and source coverage

24

Sources Queried

22

Sources With Data

March 25, 2026

Last Assessed

Executive Summary

AI-generated analysis for Looker

Looker (looker.com), a business intelligence and data analytics platform owned by Google, presents a moderate risk profile (Tier 3) based on independent assessment across 24 data sources. The platform operates under Google's infrastructure and trust umbrella, which provides meaningful baseline assurance, but several transparency gaps warrant attention before expanding data access. Looker demonstrates a number of meaningful positive signals:

Key Findings

  • The domain has been registered since 1997 (~28 years), indicating a long-established and stable online presence managed via enterprise-grade registrar MarkMonitor.
  • The domain maintains a clean reputation with no blacklist listings, no malware or phishing flags across Malware detection service, URLhaus, SURBL, or Spamhaus DBL, and a near-zero IP abuse score.
  • The HTTP security posture is strong — HTTP security scanner awarded looker.com an A+ grade (115/100), reflecting well-configured security headers on the primary application domain.
  • Infrastructure exposure is minimal: only 2 open ports (80 and 443) detected with zero known CVEs — significantly below the SaaS industry average of 8–12 open ports, representing a tightly controlled network footprint.
  • No adverse media, sanctions matches, or enforcement actions were identified across all screening sources.
  • Looker's privacy page references GDPR and CCPA compliance frameworks, and the trust center references a HIPAA Business Associate Addendum (inherited via Google Cloud Platform), all vendor-attested. Several gaps reduce confidence and drive the Tier 3 classification:
  • No SOC 2 Type II report claim was identified on any accessible trust page or third-party platform, which is a notable transparency gap for a vendor with medium data access.
  • ISO 27001 certification was not found in the IAF CertSearch registry, and no independent certification evidence was confirmed.
  • The vendor's subprocessor list page (https://looker.com/subprocessors) could not be parsed by automated tooling, leaving third-party data sharing obligations unverified.
  • No publicly accessible AI data usage policy was found, creating uncertainty about how customer data interacts with any AI or machine learning features Looker may offer.
  • The TLS certificate for the primary domain expires in 54 days, warranting confirmation that automated renewal is in place. Overall, Looker is a well-established Google-owned platform with strong infrastructure hygiene and a clean security reputation. The Tier 3 classification reflects transparency gaps — particularly around SOC 2, AI data handling, and subprocessor visibility — rather than active security concerns. A conditional approval is appropriate, contingent on resolution of the items identified below.

Independence Statement

All evidence used in this assessment was independently sourced from external data providers, public registries, and open-source intelligence — Looker had no participation in, knowledge of, or ability to influence this investigation.

Investigation Findings

3 findings identified for Looker

3 medium
medium

Missing Security Headers

looker.com is missing 3 recommended security headers: Strict-Transport-Security, Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options.

medium

Infrastructure Warning Tags

Infrastructure scanner has tagged looker.com's infrastructure with: self-signed. These may indicate security hygiene concerns.

medium

AI Data Usage Policy Not Discoverable at Standard Paths

An AI-specific data usage policy was not discoverable for looker.com through automated scanning of common policy paths and web search. The vendor may publish relevant data handling commitments in enterprise agreement documents (DPAs, product terms, licensing portals) that are not indexed at standard public URLs. Request the vendor's Data Protection Addendum or AI-specific terms directly.

Security Strengths

25 positive signals verified

Clean Website Security Scan

Website Security Scan

Legal Entity Actively Registered

Business Registration

No Sanctions Matches Found

Sanctions & Watchlist Screening

No Adverse Media Signals

Adverse Media Scan (Fallback)

Firmographic Data Available

Company Intelligence

Valid SSL Certificate

Domain Analysis

2 Open Ports Detected

Infrastructure Exposure

Established Domain (28+ years)

Domain Registration

Clean domain reputation

Threat Intelligence

Minimal Tech Community Discussion

Tech Community Sentiment

HTTP Security Grade: A+

HTTP Security Scan

Certificate Data from TLS Handshake

Certificate Transparency

Web Archive History Unavailable

Web Archive History

Domain in 1 Threat Pulse

Threat Intelligence (OTX)

Low Abuse Score: 0% (1 reports)

IP Reputation

Clean Safe Browsing Status

Malware & Phishing Check

Certification Claimed: HIPAA (Inherited)

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Certification Claimed: GDPR

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Certification Claimed: CCPA

Trust & Compliance Page Scan

Subprocessor Page Found, No Entries Parsed

Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery

Not Found as FDIC-Insured Institution

FDIC Institution Check

No SEC Enforcement Filings Found

SEC Filing Search

No Historical Adverse Media Found

Historical Media Search

HITRUST Directory Match — Manual Verification Required

Certification Registry Verification

SOC 2 Compliance Not Publicly Verifiable

Certification Registry Verification

Recommended Actions

Steps to address findings for Looker

  1. 1

    Request Looker's current SOC 2 Type II report and bridge letter directly from your account representative or Looker's security team — many Google-owned products publish these at their trust portal or make them available under NDA. Check https://looker.com/trust-center first, then contact security@google.com if unavailable. Complete within 30 days.

  2. 2

    Obtain written AI data handling commitments before enabling any AI-powered features in Looker — specifically request the Data Protection Addendum and any AI product addenda that address training data use, retention, and third-party model providers. Contact your Looker account representative and request these documents within 30 days.

  3. 3

    Manually review the subprocessor list at https://looker.com/subprocessors using a browser, and cross-reference all listed subprocessors against your organization's approved vendor list. If the page does not render structured data, formally request the current subprocessor list from Looker's privacy team within 30 days.

  4. 4

    Confirm that automated TLS certificate renewal is configured for looker.com — given Google's infrastructure management, this is likely in place. Request written or screenshot confirmation from the vendor's technical team, and verify the renewed certificate after May 18, 2026.

  5. 5

    Verify the HITRUST directory match by accessing https://directory.hitrustalliance.net/search?q=Looker directly and confirming whether the listed entity corresponds to the Looker BI platform. If confirmed, request a copy of the HITRUST certificate including scope and expiry date. Complete within 45 days.

  6. 6

    Request the executed HIPAA Business Associate Addendum applicable to your organization's Looker deployment — the trust center references a GCP-level BAA, but confirm it covers Looker specifically under your contract terms. Contact your account team or legal@google.com within 45 days.

Intelligence Sources Queried

24 sources in this assessment

22of 24 sources returned data
IP Reputation
AI Data Usage Policy
Threat Intelligence (OTX)
Certification Registry Verification
Domain Analysis
FDIC Institution Check
Business Registration
Historical Media Search
Tech Community Sentiment
Company Intelligence
Adverse Media Scan (Fallback)
HTTP Security Scan
Sanctions & Watchlist Screening
Malware & Phishing Check
SEC Filing Search
Infrastructure Exposure
SSL/TLS Analysis
Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery
Trust & Compliance Page Scan
Website Security Scan
Threat Intelligence
Domain Registration
Certificate Transparency
Web Archive History

Data Coverage Notes

Some data sources may have had limited availability during this assessment. This does not reflect negatively on the vendor.

  • Web archive history data was unavailable during this assessment, limiting the ability to verify long-term domain usage patterns. This does not affect the core risk assessment given the WHOIS-confirmed 28-year registration history.
  • Certificate Transparency log data (Certificate Transparency service) was partially unavailable; subdomain enumeration was not completed. Certificate issuer data was obtained via direct TLS handshake as a fallback.
  • External cyber risk scoring was not available for this assessment, meaning network-level risk scores from that data category could not be factored into the analysis.
  • The subprocessor page at looker.com was found but could not be parsed automatically, leaving third-party data processor relationships unverified without manual review.
  • SOC 2 compliance status is structurally unverifiable from public sources — no public registry exists for SOC 2 reports. The absence of a claim on accessible trust pages should prompt a direct request to the vendor, not be interpreted as confirmation of non-compliance.
  • HITRUST directory returned a possible match for 'Looker' at 90% confidence, but the match context was insufficient to confirm this refers to the Looker business intelligence platform rather than another entity with the same name. Manual verification with the HITRUST Alliance is required.
183+
Vendors assessed
98%
Average confidence
<2 min
Time to report
What a ThirdProof assessment covers

Sanctions Screening

Is Looker on any OFAC, EU, or UN sanctions list? Are any officers or affiliates flagged?

Cyber Risk Assessment

What is Looker's security posture? Threat intelligence scanning, known vulnerabilities, and security header analysis.

Business Registration

Is Looker a legitimately registered business entity? Corporate status, jurisdiction, and officer verification.

Adverse Media Analysis

Has Looker appeared in negative news coverage? Data breaches, lawsuits, regulatory actions, and complaints.

Domain & Infrastructure

Is Looker's website secure? TLS configuration, DNS hygiene, security headers, and domain age analysis.

Company Intelligence

What are Looker's firmographics? Employee count, industry classification, technology stack, and corporate structure.

Trust & Compliance Verification

Does Looker claim SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST, or FedRAMP? ThirdProof scans trust pages for certification claims and cross-references the FedRAMP public registry for independent verification.

Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery

Who does Looker depend on? ThirdProof discovers subprocessors from vendor-published pages and runs sanctions screening and safe browsing checks against each one.

Regulatory & Financial Filings

Has Looker appeared in SEC enforcement filings? Is it associated with any FDIC bank failures? ThirdProof searches regulatory databases with entity verification to confirm attribution.

Full methodology, rule engine, and AI disclosure: /methodology

Seeing this in an audit? ThirdProof lets you investigate Looker and every other vendor in your stack — average report time: 7 minutes. Get Looker's Full Report Free →

Frequently asked about Looker

Is Looker FedRAMP authorized?+
Looker is not currently listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace as of March 2026.
Does Looker have SOC 2 Type II?+
No SOC 2 found. Looker rated Moderate Risk — subprocessor list unavailable. See all 5 findings →
Is Looker on the OFAC sanctions list?+
Looker returned no matches in ThirdProof's OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening as of March 2026.
What is Looker's vendor risk tier?+
ThirdProof assigned Looker a risk tier of Moderate Risk with 90% confidence based on assessment across 27 intelligence sources as of March 2026.
Can I get an auto-filled security questionnaire for Looker?+
Yes. Every ThirdProof investigation of Looker produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and a 133-question security questionnaire pre-filled with evidence from 27 independent sources. The questionnaire is mapped to SIG, SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS and 9 other frameworks — answered without sending Looker a single email or waiting for a vendor response.
Is Looker safe to use as a vendor?+
Looker is a data vendor that handles organizational and customer data. Safety depends on their current security posture, certification status, and how they handle your specific data. ThirdProof automates this evaluation across 27 intelligence sources — sanctions databases (OFAC, EU, UN), business registration verification, adverse media scanning, and cyber risk assessment — producing a deterministic risk tier with confidence score plus an auto-filled security questionnaire. Run a free investigation to see Looker's full risk profile.
Does Looker have SOC 2 certification?+
No SOC 2 found. Looker rated Moderate Risk — subprocessor list unavailable. See all 5 findings →
Has Looker had any data breaches?+
Data breach history is an important signal for any vendor, particularly data platforms like Looker that handle organizational and customer data. ThirdProof's adverse media analysis searches multiple news APIs and public records for data breaches, security incidents, lawsuits, regulatory enforcement actions, and financial distress signals. Each finding is linked to its original source with severity classification.
Is Looker on any sanctions lists?+
Sanctions screening is standard due diligence for data vendors. ThirdProof screens Looker against OFAC SDN, consolidated international sanctions lists, and PEP databases. The screening uses entity name verification to reduce false positives. If Looker or any associated officers appear on a sanctions list, this triggers automatic escalation to the highest risk tier.
How do I assess Looker for vendor risk?+
Assessing Looker as a data vendor involves verifying SOC 2 Type II and data processing agreements compliance, reviewing their subprocessor chain, and checking sanctions exposure. ThirdProof automates this across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — no questionnaires or vendor participation required. Your first 5 investigations are free.
How long does a ThirdProof assessment take?+
A ThirdProof assessment completes in an average of 7 minutes. 27 intelligence sources are queried in parallel — sanctions databases, business registries, threat intelligence feeds, certificate transparency logs, and more. The result is a deterministic risk tier with confidence score and audit-ready PDF report.
Is ThirdProof free?+
ThirdProof offers 5 free vendor assessments with no credit card required. Each assessment includes the full report — risk tier, confidence score, individual findings, executive summary, and PDF export. Paid plans start at $399/month for teams that need ongoing vendor monitoring.
Can I use a ThirdProof report as SOC 2 audit evidence?+
Yes. ThirdProof reports are designed to satisfy SOC 2 CC9.2 (vendor risk management) requirements. Each report includes SHA-256 integrity verification, methodology disclosure, source attribution for every finding, and AI content labeling. Auditors can independently verify the report's authenticity and trace each finding to its original source.
How is ThirdProof different from a security questionnaire?+
Security questionnaires require vendor participation, take weeks, and produce self-reported answers. ThirdProof queries 27 independent intelligence sources — no vendor involvement needed. Risk tiers are assigned by a deterministic rules engine (not AI opinion), and every finding links to its original source. You get an audit-ready report in an average of 7 minutes instead of waiting weeks for a questionnaire response.

Looker is in your vendor stack. Can you prove you assessed them?

SOC 2 CC9.2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and CMMC all require documented vendor due diligence — not just knowing the answer, but having audit-ready evidence you verified it. Most compliance teams can't produce that documentation on demand.

ThirdProof investigates Looker across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — sanctions screening, cyber posture, SOC 2 verification, FedRAMP status, and more. Every investigation produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire your prospects and auditors expect to see.

✓ 5 free investigations✓ Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire✓ No credit card required✓ Average report time: 7 minutes

Replaces $600–$900 in manual compliance consulting time per vendor assessed.