Q37
Do you have a current SOC 2 Type II report?
SOC 2 Type II: claimed_with_trust_page
Is Jira Secure? Atlassian Jira Risk Assessment
Before you share customer data with Jira, your compliance team needs documented proof they can be trusted. ThirdProof investigated Jira across 27 intelligence sources — here's what we found.
⚠ FedRAMP Status: Not found in the FedRAMP Marketplace. Vendors handling government data or CUI must be FedRAMP authorized.
Risk Tier
Tier 3 — Moderate RiskSOC 2
⚠ Vendor AttestedFedRAMP
— Not AuthorizedLast Assessed
Apr 17, 2026🟢IP Reputation: Abuse score: 0%, 0 reports🟡SSL/TLS: TLSv1.3🟢Domain Age: 25.1 years🟢Infrastructure: 1 open port, 0 CVEs
- FedRAMP Status
- Jira is not listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace as of March 2026.
- SOC 2 Status
- Jira has a SOC 2 claim detected on their trust page. Claim is vendor-attested — no public registry exists for independent verification.
- Sanctions Screening
- Jira returned no matches in OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening.
- Risk Tier
- ThirdProof assigned Jira a Moderate Risk tier with 97% confidence across 27 intelligence sources.
27 sources queried. 97% confidence. Every Jira investigation produces both a risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire — no vendor follow-up required.
Get Jira's Full Report Free →5 free investigations|Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire|Avg. 7 minutes
Certification & Compliance Status
Security Questionnaire — Auto-Filled
45 of 133 questions answered for Jira
Auto-filled from public evidence • 34% complete
Q38
Do you have ISO 27001 certification?
Official Atlassian ISO 27001 Certificate PDF shows certification 2018-012 issued by EY CertifyPoint for Atlassian Pty Ltd.
Q41
Are you FedRAMP authorized? At what level?
Not found in FedRAMP marketplace
Q40
Are you HIPAA compliant? Do you sign BAAs?
Official Atlassian support documentation confirms HIPAA compliance is available for Jira and Confluence with signed Business Associate Agreement (BAA) for Standard, Premium, and Enterprise plans.
Q42
Are you GDPR compliant? Do you have a DPA available?
Official Atlassian Customer DPA document dated January 2023 covers GDPR and Data Processing Agreement requirements for Jira products.
+ 6 more compliance questions answered in the full report
Every investigation produces a full PDF report plus the complete 133-question questionnaire, mapped to SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SIG, and more.
Get Jira's Full Report Free →✗Not Listed on FedRAMP Marketplace
Verified against FedRAMP Marketplace API as of March 2026
Organizations with federal compliance requirements should verify this directly at marketplace.fedramp.gov.
Jira (Atlassian) — Atlassian Government Cloud offerings have FedRAMP authorization at Moderate impact level.
◇27 data sources queried per assessment
◷Reports generated in an average of 7 minutes
◈SHA-256 verified for audit integrity
✓Deterministic risk scoring — no AI guesswork
3Tier
Moderate Risk
Jira
Vendor Risk Assessment
Confidence Score97%
Based on data availability and source coverage
27
Sources Queried
24
Sources With Data
April 17, 2026
Last Assessed
Executive Summary
AI-generated analysis for Jira
Jira, published by Atlassian (atlassian.com), presents a **moderate risk posture** (Tier 3) for medium data access engagements. The assessment was conducted with high confidence (97%) across a broad evidence base covering domain infrastructure, threat intelligence, compliance claims, and subprocessor data — all sourced independently without vendor participation. Atlassian demonstrates a number of meaningful security strengths. The domain carries a clean threat reputation with no malware, phishing, or blacklist entries confirmed via manual threat intelligence engine review. Infrastructure security is well-managed, with TLS 1.3 enforced, AES-256 encryption at rest, a zero-abuse IP reputation score (0/100), and a minimal exposed attack surface (1 port visible externally, behind Cloudflare CDN). HTTP security headers achieved a B grade (75/100) with HSTS enabled. The domain has been registered since March 2001 — over 25 years — and no adverse media, sanctions matches, or SEC enforcement actions were identified. Questionnaire automation independently derived a 47% coverage rate (62/133 questions), with high-confidence confirmations on MFA support, SSO/SAML capability, GDPR/CCPA compliance, data residency options, and a publicly available Data Processing Agreement. The assessment identified three areas requiring procurement attention before unconditional approval:
Key Findings
- **AI data usage policy**: No publicly accessible AI-specific data usage policy was found at standard crawlable paths, a meaningful gap given Atlassian's active rollout of AI features within Jira. Relevant commitments may exist in enterprise DPA or product terms but are not independently confirmable.
- **FedRAMP certification contradiction**: Atlassian's trust page references FedRAMP-compliant solutions, and the FedRAMP compliance page exists, but the FedRAMP Marketplace returned no authorized listing — this is a vendor-attested claim that could not be independently verified and represents a cross-source contradiction.
- **Unverified SOC 2 claim**: SOC 2 compliance is claimed on the vendor's trust page, but no public registry exists for SOC 2 — the full Type II report and a current bridge letter must be requested directly from Atlassian. Overall, Atlassian/Jira is a well-established SaaS platform with strong infrastructure security hygiene, broadly recognized compliance programs, and a transparent subprocessor posture — the Tier 3 rating reflects unresolved certification verification gaps and the absence of a discoverable AI data policy, both of which are addressable through standard vendor engagement.
Independence Statement
All evidence in this assessment was independently sourced from external data providers, public registries, and open intelligence feeds without vendor participation, questionnaire submission, or vendor notification.
Investigation Findings
2 findings identified for Jira
2 medium
medium
Missing Security Headers
atlassian.com is missing 2 recommended security headers: Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options.
Source:Domain Analysisdns.google →
medium
AI Data Usage Policy Not Discoverable at Standard Paths
An AI-specific data usage policy was not discoverable for atlassian.com through automated scanning of common policy paths and web search. The vendor may publish relevant data handling commitments in enterprise agreement documents (DPAs, product terms, licensing portals) that are not indexed at standard public URLs. Request the vendor's Data Protection Addendum or AI-specific terms directly.
✓
Security Strengths
24 positive signals verified
✓
Established Web Presence (24+ years)
Web Archive History →✓
Domain in 50 Threat Intelligence Pulses
Threat Intelligence (OTX) →✓
Legal Entity Actively Registered
Business Registration →✓
No Sanctions Matches Found
Sanctions & Watchlist Screening →✓
No Adverse Media Found
Adverse Media Scan →✓
Firmographic Data Available
Company Intelligence →✓
Valid SSL Certificate
Domain Analysis →✓
1 Open Port Detected
Infrastructure Exposure →✓
Established Domain (25+ years)
Domain Registration →✓
Clean domain reputation
Threat Intelligence →✓
Tech Community Discussion: operational
Tech Community Sentiment →✓
Tech Community Discussion: security
Tech Community Sentiment →✓
HTTP Security Grade: B
HTTP Security Scan →✓
Certificate Data from TLS Handshake
Certificate Transparency →✓
Clean IP Reputation
IP Reputation →✓
Clean Safe Browsing Status
Malware & Phishing Check →✓
Clean Website Security Scan
Website Security Scan →✓
Certification Claimed: FedRAMP
Trust & Compliance Page Scan →✓
Certification Claimed: SOC 2
Trust & Compliance Page Scan →✓
2 Subprocessors Identified
Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery →✓
Not Found as FDIC-Insured Institution
FDIC Institution Check →✓
No SEC Enforcement Filings Found
SEC Filing Search →✓
No Historical Adverse Media Found
Historical Media Search →✓
SOC 2 Compliance Claimed on Trust Page
Certification Registry Verification →Recommended Actions
Steps to address findings for Jira
- 1
PRIORITY 1 — Request SOC 2 Type II report: Contact Atlassian's security team or visit https://atlassian.com/trust/compliance/resources to request their current SOC 2 Type II report (should be dated within the past 12 months) and a bridge letter covering the gap period to today. This is the single highest-value document for validating Atlassian's security controls.
- 2
PRIORITY 2 — Clarify FedRAMP status before any government or regulated deployment: Contact Atlassian's public sector team to obtain written clarification on whether the specific Jira product in scope is FedRAMP authorized, in-process, or FedRAMP-ready. Independently verify any claim on the FedRAMP Marketplace at https://marketplace.fedramp.gov — do not rely on the trust page language alone.
- 3
PRIORITY 3 — Obtain AI data handling commitments in writing: Before enabling Atlassian Intelligence or AI-powered features in Jira, request the applicable AI data addendum or locate the relevant DPA section. Ask specifically whether customer data is used for model training, which third-party AI providers have access to content, and what opt-out controls are available. Verify the current state at https://atlassian.com/legal.
- 4
PRIORITY 4 — Verify ISO 27001 certificate: Request the current ISO 27001 certificate (certificate number, scope, and expiry date) from Atlassian's compliance team, then manually cross-check it on the IAF CertSearch registry at https://www.iafcertsearch.org to confirm it is current and covers Jira Cloud.
- 5
PRIORITY 5 — Confirm complete subprocessor inventory: The automated scan identified only 2 subprocessors at https://atlassian.com/legal/subprocessors, which likely reflects a product-specific or abbreviated list. Request the full Atlassian subprocessor list for Jira Cloud and review for any subprocessors with elevated risk profiles or unfamiliar jurisdictions.
- 6
PRIORITY 6 — Document complementary user entity controls (CUECs): If Jira is in scope for your organization's SOC 2 boundary, document the controls your organization is responsible for — including user access provisioning/deprovisioning, MFA enforcement on your Atlassian tenant, and API token lifecycle management. Your SOC 2 auditor will expect these to be formally documented.
Intelligence Sources Queried
27 sources in this assessment
24of 27 sources returned data
IP Reputation
AI Data Usage Policy
Threat Intelligence (OTX)
Adverse Media Scan
Certification Registry Verification
Domain Analysis
FDIC Institution Check
Business Registration
Historical Media Search
Tech Community Sentiment
Company Intelligence
Adverse Media Scan (Fallback)
HTTP Security Scan
Sanctions & Watchlist Screening
Malware & Phishing Check
SEC Filing Search
Infrastructure Exposure
SSL/TLS Analysis
Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery
Trust & Compliance Page Scan
Website Security Scan
Threat Intelligence
Web Archive History
Domain Registration
Certificate Transparency
Deep Document Analysis
AI Research Agent
Data Coverage Notes
Some data sources may have had limited availability during this assessment. This does not reflect negatively on the vendor.
- Certificate Transparency log data (Certificate Transparency service) was unavailable during this assessment; certificate metadata was derived from a direct TLS handshake only, limiting subdomain enumeration.
- The subprocessor page at atlassian.com returned only 2 subprocessors (AWS and Clumio), which is unusually low for an enterprise SaaS platform of Atlassian's scale — the page queried may represent a subset or product-specific list rather than Atlassian's complete subprocessor inventory.
- No AI-specific data usage policy was discoverable at standard public URL paths; relevant AI data handling commitments may exist in enterprise DPA documents or licensing portals not accessible to automated scanning.
- ISO 27001 certification was not confirmed through the IAF CertSearch registry during automated verification; the questionnaire intelligence layer surfaced high-confidence evidence of certification via web research, but independent registry confirmation was not available.
- A deep document crawl was attempted but returned no data due to a processing issue; enterprise legal documents such as DPAs and product-specific terms of service may contain relevant security commitments not captured in this report.
- Firmographic data (headcount, company type, industry classification) was not available from the business intelligence source, limiting organizational scale context.
183+
Vendors assessed
98%
Average confidence
<2 min
Time to report
Security & Compliance Profile
34% complete · 45/133 questions answered from public sourcesAre you Jira? Claim this profile to complete your security record. Buyers are reviewing this profile now.
Claim this profile →What a ThirdProof assessment covers↓
Sanctions Screening
Is Jira on any OFAC, EU, or UN sanctions list? Are any officers or affiliates flagged?
Cyber Risk Assessment
What is Jira's security posture? Threat intelligence scanning, known vulnerabilities, and security header analysis.
Business Registration
Is Jira a legitimately registered business entity? Corporate status, jurisdiction, and officer verification.
Adverse Media Analysis
Has Jira appeared in negative news coverage? Data breaches, lawsuits, regulatory actions, and complaints.
Domain & Infrastructure
Is Jira's website secure? TLS configuration, DNS hygiene, security headers, and domain age analysis.
Company Intelligence
What are Jira's firmographics? Employee count, industry classification, technology stack, and corporate structure.
Trust & Compliance Verification
Does Jira claim SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST, or FedRAMP? ThirdProof scans trust pages for certification claims and cross-references the FedRAMP public registry for independent verification.
Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery
Who does Jira depend on? ThirdProof discovers subprocessors from vendor-published pages and runs sanctions screening and safe browsing checks against each one.
Regulatory & Financial Filings
Has Jira appeared in SEC enforcement filings? Is it associated with any FDIC bank failures? ThirdProof searches regulatory databases with entity verification to confirm attribution.
Full methodology, rule engine, and AI disclosure: /methodology
Atlassian Jira Risk Summary
Atlassian Jira received a Tier 4 (Low Risk) rating at 80% confidence. Clean sanctions, clean threat intelligence, strong domain history (24 years), and FedRAMP claimed. Primary diligence items: request SOC 2 Type II, verify FedRAMP scope matches your deployment, and review project visibility settings for any CUI or PHI workflows.
Seeing this in an audit? ThirdProof lets you investigate Jira and every other vendor in your stack — average report time: 7 minutes. Get Jira's Full Report Free →
Frequently asked about Jira
Is Jira FedRAMP authorized?+
Jira is not currently listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace as of April 2026.
Does Jira have SOC 2 Type II?+
Yes — Jira holds SOC 2 (Type II not confirmed). Rated Moderate Risk — 2 cert(s) unverified. See all 4 findings →
Is Jira on the OFAC sanctions list?+
Jira returned no matches in ThirdProof's OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening as of April 2026.
What is Jira's vendor risk tier?+
ThirdProof assigned Jira a risk tier of Moderate Risk with 97% confidence based on assessment across 27 intelligence sources as of April 2026.
Is Jira secure?+
ThirdProof investigated Atlassian Jira across 27 intelligence sources and assigned a Low Risk (Tier 4) rating with 80% confidence. Clean sanctions, clean domain reputation across 94 engines (24-year domain history), no adverse media, and a B HTTP security grade. Jira claims FedRAMP authorization — verify the specific Atlassian offering (Jira Cloud vs Atlassian Government Cloud) meets your authorization boundary requirements.
Is Atlassian Jira FedRAMP authorized?+
Atlassian claims FedRAMP authorization on its trust page. Verify directly on marketplace.fedramp.gov — Atlassian Government Cloud is the specific offering typically listed. The commercial Jira Cloud is not necessarily FedRAMP authorized. Organizations with federal compliance requirements or CUI must select the authorized Atlassian offering and confirm the authorization boundary covers their use case.
Can I get an auto-filled security questionnaire for Jira?+
Yes. Every ThirdProof investigation of Jira produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and a 133-question security questionnaire pre-filled with evidence from 27 independent sources. The questionnaire is mapped to SIG, SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS and 9 other frameworks — answered without sending Jira a single email or waiting for a vendor response.
Is Jira safe to use as a vendor?+
Jira is a developer tools vendor that handles source code and deployment credentials. Safety depends on their current security posture, certification status, and how they handle your specific data. ThirdProof automates this evaluation across 27 intelligence sources — sanctions databases (OFAC, EU, UN), business registration verification, adverse media scanning, and cyber risk assessment — producing a deterministic risk tier with confidence score plus an auto-filled security questionnaire. Run a free investigation to see Jira's full risk profile.
Does Jira have SOC 2 certification?+
Yes — Jira holds SOC 2 + 1 other cert. Rated Moderate Risk — 2 cert(s) unverified. See all 4 findings →
Has Jira had any data breaches?+
Data breach history is an important signal for any vendor, particularly developer tools platforms like Jira that handle source code and deployment credentials. ThirdProof's adverse media analysis searches multiple news APIs and public records for data breaches, security incidents, lawsuits, regulatory enforcement actions, and financial distress signals. Each finding is linked to its original source with severity classification.
Is Jira on any sanctions lists?+
Sanctions screening is standard due diligence for developer tools vendors. ThirdProof screens Jira against OFAC SDN, consolidated international sanctions lists, and PEP databases. The screening uses entity name verification to reduce false positives. If Jira or any associated officers appear on a sanctions list, this triggers automatic escalation to the highest risk tier.
How do I assess Jira for vendor risk?+
Assessing Jira as a developer tools vendor involves verifying SOC 2 and code security practices compliance, reviewing their subprocessor chain, and checking sanctions exposure. ThirdProof automates this across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — no questionnaires or vendor participation required. Your first 5 investigations are free.
How long does a ThirdProof assessment take?+
A ThirdProof assessment completes in an average of 7 minutes. 27 intelligence sources are queried in parallel — sanctions databases, business registries, threat intelligence feeds, certificate transparency logs, and more. The result is a deterministic risk tier with confidence score and audit-ready PDF report.
Is ThirdProof free?+
ThirdProof offers 5 free vendor assessments with no credit card required. Each assessment includes the full report — risk tier, confidence score, individual findings, executive summary, and PDF export. Paid plans start at $399/month for teams that need ongoing vendor monitoring.
Can I use a ThirdProof report as SOC 2 audit evidence?+
Yes. ThirdProof reports are designed to satisfy SOC 2 CC9.2 (vendor risk management) requirements. Each report includes SHA-256 integrity verification, methodology disclosure, source attribution for every finding, and AI content labeling. Auditors can independently verify the report's authenticity and trace each finding to its original source.
How is ThirdProof different from a security questionnaire?+
Security questionnaires require vendor participation, take weeks, and produce self-reported answers. ThirdProof queries 27 independent intelligence sources — no vendor involvement needed. Risk tiers are assigned by a deterministic rules engine (not AI opinion), and every finding links to its original source. You get an audit-ready report in an average of 7 minutes instead of waiting weeks for a questionnaire response.
Jira is in your vendor stack. Can you prove you assessed them?
SOC 2 CC9.2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and CMMC all require documented vendor due diligence — not just knowing the answer, but having audit-ready evidence you verified it. Most compliance teams can't produce that documentation on demand.
ThirdProof investigates Jira across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — sanctions screening, cyber posture, SOC 2 verification, FedRAMP status, and more. Every investigation produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire your prospects and auditors expect to see.
✓ 5 free investigations✓ Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire✓ No credit card required✓ Average report time: 7 minutes
Replaces $600–$900 in manual compliance consulting time per vendor assessed.