Q37
Do you have a current SOC 2 Type II report?
SOC 2 Type II: claimed_with_trust_page
Figma SOC 2 Type II Report & ISO 27001 Status
Before you share customer data with Figma, your compliance team needs documented proof they can be trusted. ThirdProof investigated Figma across 27 intelligence sources — here's what we found.
⚠ FedRAMP Status: Not found in the FedRAMP Marketplace. Vendors handling government data or CUI must be FedRAMP authorized.
Risk Tier
Tier 3 — Moderate RiskSOC 2
⚠ Vendor AttestedFedRAMP
— Not AuthorizedLast Assessed
Apr 5, 2026🟢IP Reputation: Abuse score: 0%, 0 reports🟡SSL/TLS: TLSv1.3🟢Domain Age: 27 years🟢Infrastructure: 1 open port, 0 CVEs
- FedRAMP Status
- Figma is not listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace as of March 2026.
- SOC 2 Status
- Figma has a SOC 2 claim detected on their trust page. Claim is vendor-attested — no public registry exists for independent verification.
- Sanctions Screening
- Figma returned no matches in OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening.
- Risk Tier
- ThirdProof assigned Figma a Moderate Risk tier with 100% confidence across 27 intelligence sources.
25 sources queried. 100% confidence. Every Figma investigation produces both a risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire — no vendor follow-up required.
Get Figma's Full Report Free →5 free investigations|Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire|Avg. 7 minutes
Certification & Compliance Status
Security Questionnaire — Auto-Filled
48 of 133 questions answered for Figma
Auto-filled from public evidence • 36% complete
Q38
Do you have ISO 27001 certification?
ISO 27001 claim found on trust page (Vendor attested)
Q41
Are you FedRAMP authorized? At what level?
Not found in FedRAMP marketplace
Q40
Are you HIPAA compliant? Do you sign BAAs?
Figma's SSA document addresses security measures and training but no explicit BAA agreement or HIPAA compliance statement is confirmed in provided evidence.
Q42
Are you GDPR compliant? Do you have a DPA available?
Figma has a Data Protection Addendum (DPA) that forms part of agreements with customers covering GDPR compliance and data protection laws.
+ 6 more compliance questions answered in the full report
Every investigation produces a full PDF report plus the complete 133-question questionnaire, mapped to SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SIG, and more.
Get Figma's Full Report Free →✗Not Listed on FedRAMP Marketplace
Verified against FedRAMP Marketplace API as of March 2026
Organizations with federal compliance requirements should verify this directly at marketplace.fedramp.gov.
Figma is not listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace.
◇27 data sources queried per assessment
◷Reports generated in an average of 7 minutes
◈SHA-256 verified for audit integrity
✓Deterministic risk scoring — no AI guesswork
3Tier
Moderate Risk
Figma
Vendor Risk Assessment
Confidence Score100%
Based on data availability and source coverage
25
Sources Queried
25
Sources With Data
April 5, 2026
Last Assessed
Executive Summary
AI-generated analysis for Figma
Figma, Inc. (figma.com) is a publicly traded, enterprise-grade collaborative design SaaS platform assessed at Tier 3 (Moderate Risk), reflecting a broadly sound security posture offset by an active class action lawsuit and unresolved ambiguity around AI data handling practices. Figma presents several meaningful positive signals. The domain has been registered since 1999 and carries a fully clean reputation across all blacklist and malware databases. Infrastructure exposure is minimal — only 1 open port detected, 0 known CVEs, and a Cloudflare CDN providing an additional defensive perimeter, representing a well-controlled footprint significantly below the SaaS industry average of 8–12 open ports. The HTTP security grade is B (75/100), indicating strong baseline security header configuration. Malware detection service, IP reputation, and website security scans all return clean results. Figma publishes a comprehensive subprocessor list at figma.com/sub-processors (36 subprocessors identified), with none flagged across sanctions or safety databases. The vendor claims a strong compliance posture on its security page (https://figma.com/security), including:
Key Findings
- SOC 2 Type II (vendor-attested, unverified)
- ISO 27001:2022 (vendor-attested, unverified)
- ISO 27017 and ISO 27018 (vendor-attested, unverified)
- FedRAMP Authorized (vendor-attested, unverified) Two areas require attention prior to full approval. First, a class action lawsuit filed in November 2025 alleges that Figma misused customer design data for AI model training — this litigation is active and directly relevant to organizations sharing design assets with the platform. Second, Figma's published AI/privacy policy does not clearly articulate whether customer data is or is not used to train AI models, despite an opt-out mechanism being present. This ambiguity, combined with the active lawsuit, elevates AI data handling as the primary residual risk for this engagement. Additionally, none of the five claimed certifications could be independently verified through public registries during this investigation. Figma is a well-established, operationally mature SaaS vendor with strong infrastructure and supply chain hygiene. The Tier 3 rating reflects litigation and AI policy ambiguity rather than fundamental security deficiencies — conditional approval with targeted contractual and documentation requirements is appropriate.
Independence Statement
All evidence underpinning this report was independently sourced from external data providers, public registries, and open-source intelligence without participation or prior notification to the vendor under investigation.
Investigation Findings
6 findings identified for Figma
1 high4 medium1 low
high
Adverse Media: legal
Article from www.reuters.com: "Figma sued for allegedly misusing customer data for AI training | Reuters"
medium
Missing Security Headers
figma.com is missing 2 recommended security headers: Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options.
Source:Domain Analysisdns.google →
medium
Multiple Certificate Issuers (31)
figma.com has certificates from 31 different Certificate Authorities. This may indicate inconsistent certificate management practices.
medium
New Web Presence (< 1 year)
figma.com first appeared less than 1 year ago (2026-03-06). This indicates a relatively new web presence.
medium
AI Training Data Practices Unclear
figma.com has an AI-related policy page but does not clearly state whether customer data is used for AI model training.
low
Young Entity Registration
FIGMA, INC. was first registered approximately 14 months ago.
✓
Security Strengths
28 positive signals verified
✓
Legal Entity Actively Registered
Business Registration →✓
No Sanctions Matches Found
Sanctions & Watchlist Screening →✓
No Adverse Media Signals
Adverse Media Scan (Fallback) →✓
Firmographic Data Available
Company Intelligence →✓
Valid SSL Certificate
Domain Analysis →✓
1 Open Port Detected
Infrastructure Exposure →✓
Established Domain (26+ years)
Domain Registration →✓
Clean domain reputation
Threat Intelligence →✓
Tech Community Discussion: legal
Tech Community Sentiment →✓
Tech Community Discussion: trust
Tech Community Sentiment →✓
Tech Community Discussion: financial
Tech Community Sentiment →✓
HTTP Security Grade: B
HTTP Security Scan →✓
Large Certificate Footprint (57 subdomains)
Certificate Transparency →✓
Domain in 20 Threat Intelligence Pulses
Threat Intelligence (OTX) →✓
Clean IP Reputation
IP Reputation →✓
Clean Safe Browsing Status
Malware & Phishing Check →✓
Clean Website Security Scan
Website Security Scan →✓
Certification Claimed: SOC 2
Trust & Compliance Page Scan →✓
Certification Claimed: ISO 27001
Trust & Compliance Page Scan →✓
Certification Claimed: ISO 27017
Trust & Compliance Page Scan →✓
Certification Claimed: ISO 27018
Trust & Compliance Page Scan →✓
Certification Claimed: FedRAMP
Trust & Compliance Page Scan →✓
36 Subprocessors Identified
Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery →✓
Not Found as FDIC-Insured Institution
FDIC Institution Check →✓
No SEC Enforcement Filings Found
SEC Filing Search →✓
No Historical Adverse Media Found
Historical Media Search →✓
SOC 2 Compliance Claimed on Trust Page
Certification Registry Verification →✓
AI Data Retention Policy Not Specified
AI Data Usage Policy →Recommended Actions
Steps to address findings for Figma
- 1
Activate Figma's AI opt-out mechanism for your account immediately and request written confirmation from Figma (security@figma.com or your account manager) that your organization's content is excluded from AI model training — this directly addresses both rf-1 and rf-5 and should be completed within 14 days.
- 2
Request Figma's current SOC 2 Type II report and bridge letter — contact their security team or visit https://figma.com/security where many enterprise vendors offer NDA-gated report downloads. This is the only reliable path to verify SOC 2 compliance given that no public registry exists for SOC 2.
- 3
Independently verify FedRAMP Authorized status by searching 'Figma' at https://marketplace.fedramp.gov — this takes under 5 minutes and provides definitive confirmation or refutation of the vendor's claim without requiring vendor contact.
- 4
Request Figma's ISO 27001:2022 certificate (with certificate number, issuing body, and expiry date) and cross-reference it at https://www.iafcertsearch.org to confirm active certification status.
- 5
Obtain a signed Data Processing Addendum (DPA) from Figma that explicitly prohibits use of customer-uploaded design content for AI model training or improvement, and ensures downstream AI subprocessors (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google Vertex, et al.) are contractually bound by the same restriction — review the current subprocessor list at https://figma.com/sub-processors.
- 6
Monitor the class action litigation (California federal court, filed November 2025) for material developments — set a 90-day review checkpoint to reassess whether any settlement terms, court orders, or changes to Figma's AI data practices affect your risk posture.
Intelligence Sources Queried
25 sources in this assessment
25of 25 sources returned data
IP Reputation
AI Data Usage Policy
Threat Intelligence (OTX)
Adverse Media Scan
Certification Registry Verification
Certificate Transparency
Domain Analysis
FDIC Institution Check
Business Registration
Historical Media Search
Tech Community Sentiment
Company Intelligence
Adverse Media Scan (Fallback)
HTTP Security Scan
Sanctions & Watchlist Screening
Malware & Phishing Check
SEC Filing Search
Infrastructure Exposure
SSL/TLS Analysis
Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery
Trust & Compliance Page Scan
Website Security Scan
Threat Intelligence
Web Archive History
Domain Registration
Data Coverage Notes
Some data sources may have had limited availability during this assessment. This does not reflect negatively on the vendor.
- Web archive history for figma.com returned a first-seen date of March 2026, which conflicts with the domain's 26-year registration history and the company's well-documented operational history. This data point reflects a limitation of the web archiving source used and should not be interpreted as a signal of a new or unestablished web presence.
- ISO 27001 certification could not be located on the IAF CertSearch public registry (iafcertsearch.org) during this investigation. This may reflect indexing lag, certificate issuance under a subsidiary or holding entity name, or a registry access limitation — it does not confirm the certification is absent. Manual verification by requesting the certificate directly from Figma is the recommended resolution.
- FedRAMP Authorized status is claimed on Figma's security page but was not confirmed via the FedRAMP Marketplace registry (marketplace.fedramp.gov) during this investigation. Buyers for whom FedRAMP status is a procurement requirement should independently verify current authorization status on the marketplace before relying on this claim.
- External cyber risk scoring was not available for figma.com during this investigation, limiting the ability to provide a quantitative third-party security posture benchmark.
- AI data usage policy analysis identified an opt-out mechanism but could not determine the specific scope, trigger conditions, or account-level configuration process from the publicly available policy text alone. Direct vendor engagement is required to clarify AI processing controls.
183+
Vendors assessed
98%
Average confidence
<2 min
Time to report
Security & Compliance Profile
36% complete · 48/133 questions answered from public sourcesAre you Figma? Claim this profile to complete your security record. Buyers are reviewing this profile now.
Claim this profile →What a ThirdProof assessment covers↓
Sanctions Screening
Is Figma on any OFAC, EU, or UN sanctions list? Are any officers or affiliates flagged?
Cyber Risk Assessment
What is Figma's security posture? Threat intelligence scanning, known vulnerabilities, and security header analysis.
Business Registration
Is Figma a legitimately registered business entity? Corporate status, jurisdiction, and officer verification.
Adverse Media Analysis
Has Figma appeared in negative news coverage? Data breaches, lawsuits, regulatory actions, and complaints.
Domain & Infrastructure
Is Figma's website secure? TLS configuration, DNS hygiene, security headers, and domain age analysis.
Company Intelligence
What are Figma's firmographics? Employee count, industry classification, technology stack, and corporate structure.
Trust & Compliance Verification
Does Figma claim SOC 2, ISO 27001, HITRUST, or FedRAMP? ThirdProof scans trust pages for certification claims and cross-references the FedRAMP public registry for independent verification.
Supply Chain & Subprocessor Discovery
Who does Figma depend on? ThirdProof discovers subprocessors from vendor-published pages and runs sanctions screening and safe browsing checks against each one.
Regulatory & Financial Filings
Has Figma appeared in SEC enforcement filings? Is it associated with any FDIC bank failures? ThirdProof searches regulatory databases with entity verification to confirm attribution.
Full methodology, rule engine, and AI disclosure: /methodology
Figma Compliance and Certification Status
Figma claims SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, FedRAMP, GDPR, and CCPA compliance — one of the broadest certification profiles among design tools. Organizations should verify these certifications directly given the Adobe acquisition, which may affect certification scope and renewal timelines. For design teams using Figma alongside project management tools, see the Linear security review for an example of assessing connected vendor risk.
Figma Security Posture
ThirdProof investigated Figma across 27 intelligence sources and assigned a Moderate Risk (Tier 3) rating with 86% confidence. Domain reputation is clean across 94 security engines with a 26-year domain history and A+ SSL/TLS grade. Sanctions screening is clear with no matches. No malware, phishing indicators, or adverse media were detected. The B (75/100) HTTP security grade reflects standard enterprise web application configuration.
Seeing this in an audit? ThirdProof lets you investigate Figma and every other vendor in your stack — average report time: 7 minutes. Get Figma's Full Report Free →
Frequently asked about Figma
Is Figma FedRAMP authorized?+
Figma is not currently listed on the FedRAMP Marketplace as of April 2026.
Does Figma have SOC 2 Type II?+
Yes — Figma holds SOC 2 (Type II not confirmed). Rated Moderate Risk — adverse media detected. See all 5 findings →
Is Figma on the OFAC sanctions list?+
Figma returned no matches in ThirdProof's OFAC SDN, EU Consolidated, and UN sanctions screening as of April 2026.
What is Figma's vendor risk tier?+
ThirdProof assigned Figma a risk tier of Moderate Risk with 100% confidence based on assessment across 27 intelligence sources as of April 2026.
Is Figma ISO 27001 certified?+
Figma claims ISO 27001, ISO 27017 (cloud security), and ISO 27018 (PII in cloud) certifications. These claims are vendor-attested on Figma's trust page. ThirdProof's assessment flags certifications that could not be independently verified — request Figma's ISO 27001 certificate directly to confirm scope, certification body, and validity period.
Is Figma safe for enterprise design teams?+
ThirdProof investigated Figma across 27 intelligence sources and assigned a Moderate Risk (Tier 3) rating with 86% confidence. Sanctions screening is clear, domain reputation is clean across 94 security engines, and SSL/TLS is rated A+. Figma claims SOC 2, ISO 27001, and FedRAMP compliance. Design files may contain sensitive product information — ensure your Figma workspace settings align with your data classification policy.
Can I get an auto-filled security questionnaire for Figma?+
Yes. Every ThirdProof investigation of Figma produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and a 133-question security questionnaire pre-filled with evidence from 27 independent sources. The questionnaire is mapped to SIG, SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS and 9 other frameworks — answered without sending Figma a single email or waiting for a vendor response.
Is Figma safe to use as a vendor?+
Figma is a design vendor that handles organizational data. Safety depends on their current security posture, certification status, and how they handle your specific data. ThirdProof automates this evaluation across 27 intelligence sources — sanctions databases (OFAC, EU, UN), business registration verification, adverse media scanning, and cyber risk assessment — producing a deterministic risk tier with confidence score plus an auto-filled security questionnaire. Run a free investigation to see Figma's full risk profile.
Does Figma have SOC 2 certification?+
Yes — Figma holds SOC 2 + 4 other certs. Rated Moderate Risk — adverse media detected. See all 5 findings →
Has Figma had any data breaches?+
Data breach history is an important signal for any vendor, particularly design platforms like Figma that handle organizational data. ThirdProof's adverse media analysis searches multiple news APIs and public records for data breaches, security incidents, lawsuits, regulatory enforcement actions, and financial distress signals. Each finding is linked to its original source with severity classification.
Is Figma on any sanctions lists?+
Sanctions screening is standard due diligence for design vendors. ThirdProof screens Figma against OFAC SDN, consolidated international sanctions lists, and PEP databases. The screening uses entity name verification to reduce false positives. If Figma or any associated officers appear on a sanctions list, this triggers automatic escalation to the highest risk tier.
How do I assess Figma for vendor risk?+
Assessing Figma as a design vendor involves verifying SOC 2 Type II and applicable industry standards compliance, reviewing their subprocessor chain, and checking sanctions exposure. ThirdProof automates this across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — no questionnaires or vendor participation required. Your first 5 investigations are free.
How long does a ThirdProof assessment take?+
A ThirdProof assessment completes in an average of 7 minutes. 27 intelligence sources are queried in parallel — sanctions databases, business registries, threat intelligence feeds, certificate transparency logs, and more. The result is a deterministic risk tier with confidence score and audit-ready PDF report.
Is ThirdProof free?+
ThirdProof offers 5 free vendor assessments with no credit card required. Each assessment includes the full report — risk tier, confidence score, individual findings, executive summary, and PDF export. Paid plans start at $399/month for teams that need ongoing vendor monitoring.
Can I use a ThirdProof report as SOC 2 audit evidence?+
Yes. ThirdProof reports are designed to satisfy SOC 2 CC9.2 (vendor risk management) requirements. Each report includes SHA-256 integrity verification, methodology disclosure, source attribution for every finding, and AI content labeling. Auditors can independently verify the report's authenticity and trace each finding to its original source.
How is ThirdProof different from a security questionnaire?+
Security questionnaires require vendor participation, take weeks, and produce self-reported answers. ThirdProof queries 27 independent intelligence sources — no vendor involvement needed. Risk tiers are assigned by a deterministic rules engine (not AI opinion), and every finding links to its original source. You get an audit-ready report in an average of 7 minutes instead of waiting weeks for a questionnaire response.
Also investigate these vendors
Figma is in your vendor stack. Can you prove you assessed them?
SOC 2 CC9.2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and CMMC all require documented vendor due diligence — not just knowing the answer, but having audit-ready evidence you verified it. Most compliance teams can't produce that documentation on demand.
ThirdProof investigates Figma across 27 intelligence sources in an average of 7 minutes — sanctions screening, cyber posture, SOC 2 verification, FedRAMP status, and more. Every investigation produces two deliverables: an audit-ready risk report and an auto-filled security questionnaire your prospects and auditors expect to see.
✓ 5 free investigations✓ Risk report + auto-filled questionnaire✓ No credit card required✓ Average report time: 7 minutes
Replaces $600–$900 in manual compliance consulting time per vendor assessed.